The construct of planning, operationalized as strategic planning, rehearsal and on-line planning (Ellis 2009), has been much studied in the task-based language teaching literature. These forms of planning could be thought of as task-external readiness in which extra preparatory time is provided for learners to focus their attention on certain performance areas. This chapter proposes a theoretical framework of task-readiness as an extension to planning so that task research in planning could broaden its horizons from a task-external perspective to also include a task-internal perspective, that is, familiarity with aspects of a task.To examine the relationship between task-external and task internal readiness, this study explores the effects of topic familiarity (task-internal readiness), strategic planning (task-external readiness), and proficiency levels (an individual difference) in a 2 × 2 × 2 split-plot factorial design. The results show that both topic familiarity and strategic planning promoted more fluent language, but strategic planning was a stronger form of task-readiness as indicated by its effect sizes. In contrast, topic familiarity induced more accurate performance from the participants, while planning was associated with significantly higher complexity. Proficiency seemed to be positively related to formal accuracy rather than to fluency as higher proficiency participants always scored higher in accuracy and sometimes in complexity, but not so much in fluency. These findings suggest that though task-internal readiness and task-external readiness share common factors in rendering assistance to learners, they differ in their influence on various performance areas as well as the magnitude of the effects. All this lends support to the differentiation between task-external and task-internal readiness, and to the notion of task-readiness as a contextualizing framework for relevant task research. Based on the theoretical discussion and empirical results, pedagogical implications are also outlined in this chapter.
Baddeley, A. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Barry, S., & Lazarte, A. (1995). Embedded clause effects on recall: Does high prior knowledge of content domain overcome syntactic complexity in students of Spanish?Modern Language Journal, 79, 491–504.
Banks, J. (2004). The impact of event familiarity on the complexity and coherence of children narratives of positive events. Unpublished MSc thesis. North Carolina State University.
Bei, X.G. (2010). Exploring task-internal and task-external readiness: The effects of topic familiarity and strategic planning in topic-based task performance at different proficiency levels. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Bei, X.G. (2011). Formality in second language discourse: Measurement and performance. Interdisciplinary Humanities, 28(1), 22–31.
Bei, X.G. (2013). Effects of immediate repetition in L2 speaking task: A focused study. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 11–19.
Bui, H.Y.G. (In review). L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning performance and methodology. Submitted to Language Teaching Research.
Bui, H.Y.G. (In preparation). Lexical diversity, lexical sophistication and lexical density in L2 speaking tasks. Unpublished manuscript.
Bortfeld, H., Leon, S.D., Bloom, J.E., Schober, M.F., & Brennan, S.E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147.
Bügel, K., & Buunk, B. (1996). Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 80, 15–31.
Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Oxford: Heinemann.
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds). Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.23–48). Harlow: Longman.
Chang, C. (2006). Effects of topic familiarity and linguistic difficulty on the reading strategies and mental representations of non-native readers of Chinese. Journal of Language and Learning, 4, 172–198.
Chang, Y.F. (1999). Discourse topics and interlanguage variation. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Representation and process: Proceedings of the 3rd Pacific Second Language Research Forum (Vol. 1, pp. 235–241). Tokyo: PacSLRF.
Chen, Q., & Donin, J. (1997). Discourse processing of first and second language biology texts: Effects of language proficiency and domain-specific knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 81, 209–227.
Chiang, C.S., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 345–373.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383.
Dornyei, Z., & Katona, L. (1992). Validation of the C-test amongst Hungarian EFL learners. Language Testing, 9, 187–206.
Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 Oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509.
Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: a consideration of their role in task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Teaching, learning and testing (pp. 75–97). Longman, London.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354- 375.
Gardner, R.C. (2001). Psychological statistics using SPSS for Windows. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Good, D.A., & Butterworth, B. (1980). Hesitancy as a conversational resource: some methodological implications. In H. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech production (pp. 145–152). The Hague: Mouton.
Heylighen, F., & Dewaele, J. (1999). Formality of language: Definition, measurement and behavioral determinants. Internal report, Center “Leo Apostel”, Free University of Brussels.
Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of text. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 169–181.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge of discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 92, 163–182.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: CUP.
Lee, J.F. (1986). Background knowledge and L2 reading. Modern Language Journal, 70, 350–354.
Lee, S.K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language learning, 57, 87–118.
Leeser, M.J. (2004). The effects of topic familiarity, mode, and pausing on second language learnres’ comprehension and focus on form. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 587–615.
Leeser, M.J. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57(2), 229–270.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Long, D.R. (1990). What you don’t know can’t help you: An exploratory study of background knowledge and second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 65–80.
Markham, P., & Latham, M. (1987). The influence of religious-specific background knowledge on the listening comprehension of adult second-language students. Language Learning, 37, 157–170.
Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83–108.
Merlo, S., & Mansur, L.L. (2004). Descriptive discourse: Topic familiarity and disfluencies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 489–503.
Mohan, B.A. (1986). Language and Content. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ortega L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148.
Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Norris, J., & Rabie, S. (in preparation). A multi-language comparison of syntacticcomplexity measures and their relationships to foreign language proficiency. Manuscript in preparation.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57.
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain (Eds), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119–140). London: Longman.
Schmidt-Rinehart, B.C. (1994). The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 179–189.
Shimoda, T.A. (1993). The effects of interesting examples and topic familiarity on text comprehension, attention, and reading speed. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 93–103.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.
Skehan, P. (2009). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language learning tasks. In B. Richards, H.M. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: the interface between theory and application (pp. 107–124). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research,1(3),185–211.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions in narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.
Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. Retrieved April 18, 2009 from [URL].
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D.M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological review, 80(5), 352–373.
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-Line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27.
Wang, Z. (2009). Modeling L2 Speech Production and Performance: Evidence from Five Types of Planning and Two Task Structures. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14(1), 85–106.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Skehan, Peter, Gavin Bui, Zhan Wang & Sabrina Shum
2024. Re-examining accuracy measures in second language task-based spoken performance. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 100098 ff.
Garcia-Ponce, Edgar Emmanuell, M. Martha Lengeling, Irasema Mora-Pablo & Lisa Marie Conaway Arroyo
2023. Use of WhatsApp as a Platform to Promote English Oral Fluency and Accuracy: A Task Repetition Approach. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 28:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Rezaei, Amir & Antonella Valeo
2023. Investigating the impact of task complexity on uptake and noticing of corrective feedback recasts. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:4 ► pp. 1271 ff.
Xu, Jian, Xuyan Qiu & Lei Yang
2023. Unraveling the dynamics of English communicative motivation and self-efficacy through task-supported language teaching: a latent growth modeling perspective. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Bui, Gavin & Kevin W. H. Tai
2022. Revisiting functional adequacy and task-based language teaching in the GBA: insights from translanguaging. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 7:1
Qiu, Xuyan
2022. Picture or non-picture? The influence of narrative task types on lower- and higher-proficiency EFL learners’ oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:2 ► pp. 383 ff.
Qiu, Xuyan & Gavin Bui
2022. “We Are Responsive on Zoom, but…”. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 12:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Qiu, Xuyan & Hong Cheng
2022. The effects of task types on L2 oral production and learner engagement. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 1063 ff.
2021. Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency and pre-task planning on L2 lexical complexity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4 ► pp. 543 ff.
Bui, Gavin & Rhett Yu
2021. Differentiating Task Repetition from Task Rehearsal. In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment, ► pp. 119 ff.
Wang, Zhan, Peter Skehan & Gaowei Chen
2019. The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Qiu, Xuyan & Yuen Yi Lo
2017. Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research 21:6 ► pp. 681 ff.
Pfenninger, Simone E & David Singleton
2016. Affect trumps age: A person-in-context relational view of age and motivation in SLA. Second Language Research 32:3 ► pp. 311 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.