Cover not available
Part of
Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy: In honour of Peter Skehan
Edited by Zhisheng (Edward) Wen and Mohammad Javad Ahmadian
[Task-Based Language Teaching 13] 2019
► pp. 305–316

Chapter 13
Task-based analysis and the Competition Model

| Carnegie Mellon University
This chapter examines relations between Peter Skehan’s task-based analysis of second language production (Skehan, 1998) and the Competition Model (MacWhinney, 2012, 2015b). Both of these approaches have a long history of development. However, until recently, there has been little interaction between these two perspectives. In this paper, I will suggest that there is more room for interaction than previously imagined, and I will illustrate ways in which the Competition Model can benefit from the important insights and methods Skehan has developed. In addition to these conceptual interactions, there are now important methodological interactions that are becoming possible through the development of the new FluencyBank system at <https://​fluency​.talkbank​.org>.
Article outline
  • Fluency
  • Complexity
  • Accuracy and lexical complexity
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 28 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.14mac
References (43)
References
Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., & Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, C., Snodgrass, T., Kemper, S. J., Herman, R., & Covington, M. A. (2008). Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 40(2), 540–545. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Covington, M. (2007). MATTR user manual (CASPR research report 2007–05). Athens, GA. Retrieved from < [URL]>Google Scholar
de Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 533–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dominey, P., Hoen, M., & Inui, T. (2006). A neurolinguistic model of grammatical construction processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2088–2177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, M., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-Gracía, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49(4), 549–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F. (2005). Chunking models of expertise: Implications for Education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(183–204).Google Scholar
Kemmerer, D. (2015). The cognitive neuroscience of language. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kowalski, J., Gordon, G., & MacWhinney, B. (2014). Statistical modeling of student performance to improve Chinese dictation skills with an intelligent tutor. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 6, 3–27.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, P., Zhao, X., & MacWhinney, B. (2007). Dynamic self-organization and early lexical development in children. Cognitive Science, 31, 581–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1982). Basic syntactic processes. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language acquisition, Vol. 1: Syntax and semantics (pp.73–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1989). Competition and lexical categorization. In R. Corrigan, F. Eckman, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Linguistic categorization (pp.195–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). How mental models encode embodied linguistic perspectives. In R. Klatzky, B. MacWhinney, & M. Behrmann (Eds.), Embodiment, ego-space, and action (pp.369–410). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2012). The logic of the Unified Model. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp.211–227). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2014a). Conclusions: Competition across time. In B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov, & E. Moravcsik (Eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage (pp.364–386). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014b). Item-based patterns in early syntactic development. In T. Herbst, H.-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions Collocations Patterns (pp.33–70). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
(2015a). Emergentism. In E. Dabrowsksa & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.689–706). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Multidimensional SLA. In S. Eskilde & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp.22–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1978). Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: A cross-cultural developmental study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 539–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.). (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., & McDonald, J. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 255–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. (1987). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 379–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Maximum likelihood models for sentence processing research. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp.397–421). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKee, G., Malvern, D. D., Richards, B. J., & Knott, R. (1998). Vocd: Software for measuring vocabulary diversity through mathematical modelling. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic carpentry. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlik, P., Presson, N., Dozzi, G., Wu, S., MacWhinney, B., & Koedinger, K. R. (2007). The FaCT (Fact and Concept Training) system: A new tool linking cognitive science with educators. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.1379–1384). Nashville, TN: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Presson, N., Davy, C., & MacWhinney, B. (2013). Experimentalized CALL for adult second language learners. In J. Schwieter (Ed.), Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism (pp.139–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Presson, N., MacWhinney, B., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Learning grammatical gender: The use of rules by novice learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 709–737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, A. C., Turk-Browne, N. B., Botvinick, M. M., & Norman, K. A. (2017). Complementary learning systems within the hippocampus: a neural network modelling approach to reconciling episodic memory with statistical learning. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 372(1711), 20160049. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2014). Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., Foster, P., & Shum, S. (2016). Ladders and snakes in second language fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 54(2), 97–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stocco, A., Lebiere, C., & Anderson, J. R. (2010). Conditional routing of information to the cortex: A model of the basal ganglia’s role in cognitive coordination. Psychological Review, 117(2), 541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, D. (2015). Instructing German declension: Additive versus concept-based approaches. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University,Google Scholar
Wong, A., Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). A cognitive linguistics application for second language pedagogy: The English preposition tutor. Language Learning. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshimura, Y., & MacWhinney, B. (2007). The effect of oral repetition in L2 speech fluency: System for an experimental tool and a language tutor. SLATE Conference, 25–28.Google Scholar
Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). The instructed learning of form–function mappings in the English article system. Modern Language Journal. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

MacWhinney, Brian
2022. The Competition Model: Past and Future. In A Life in Cognition [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 11], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.