Chapter 16
Managing publication expectations and collaborations
On the ethics of co-authoring
in Applied Linguistics
Collaborative research and co-authoring are
ubiquitous work practices in higher education. With current funding
models and promotion expectations, research is becoming more
collaborative with publications co-authored by two or more scholars.
Macro-level ethical guidelines established by professional
organizations are a useful starting point for understanding how to
approach collaborations and co-authorships, as much has been already
said about how to work responsibly within a given discipline.
However, questions of ethics in research need be pursued by
tempering macro-level guidelines with micro-level considerations,
such as the unique and specific challenges that are involved in
working on diverse empirical topics. To this end, we draw on our
experiences co-authoring publications to explore the relationship
between micro-level considerations and macro-level guidelines in
applied linguistics research. We explore the complexities of
distributing responsibilities to a team of researchers, managing
uneven power dynamics, and negotiating the authorship order for
contributors. By grounding our discussion within the context of
actual work done in collaboration by both authors, we provide
readers with concrete examples of how to attend to the ethics of
collaborative research and co-authoring.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Macro-ethics versus micro-ethics in applied linguistics
research
- Macro-ethics of co-authorship in applied linguistics
- Micro-ethics of co-authorship in applied linguistics
- Selecting collaborators
- Roles and responsibilities
- Ethics specialist
- Power dynamics
- Conclusion
-
Note
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.