Cover not available
Part of
Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón and Julio Roca de Larios
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 5] 2023
► pp. 141–160

Chapter 7
Direct observation of writing activity

Screen capture technologies

| University of Ottawa
| Carleton University
Emerging technologies and the rise of internet-mediated writing spaces have contributed to the appearance of new forms of digital practices that have transformed writing and its development. These technologies also present important methodological opportunities for researchers interested in the study of writing processes and writing development. This chapter offers a critical overview of one such opportunity: the use of screen capture technologies (SCT) as a means of documenting and engaging in direct real-time observation of language learners’ digitally mediated writing activities. After a brief description of SCT, this chapter reviews the research questions explored and insights gleaned about writing processes and writing development with SCT. It then addresses the methodological challenges and potential solutions associated with the integration of SCT data within research projects in terms of research design, data collection, data analysis and reporting, and ethical considerations. The chapter concludes by suggesting some potential future avenues for writing process research enabled by the use of SCT.
Article outline
  • Introducing screen capture technologies
  • Research questions SCT has helped investigate
    • Exploring pedagogic applications of SCT
    • Exploring writing in action
    • Examining the visuospatial dimensions of writing
    • Exploring online resources
  • Methodological challenges and potential solutions in using SCT for writing process research
    • Research design: Pre-established vs. emergent focus
    • Research design: Controlled vs. naturally occurring writing tasks
    • Data collection: Controlled vs. naturally occurring digital writing environments
    • Developing a framework for data analysis
    • Choosing a unit of analysis and criteria for data segmentation
    • Using software for the transcription and analysis of SCT data
    • Triangulating and integrating data
    • Data reporting and presentation
    • Ethical issues
  • Avenues for future writing process research
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.5.07ser
References (62)
References
Abdel Latif, M. M. (2019). Eye-tracking in recent L2 learner process research: A review of areas, issues, and methodological approaches. System, 83, 25–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asselin, M., & Moayeri, M. (2010). New tools for new literacies research: An exploration of usability testing software. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(1), 41–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C., & Withers, J. (2018). What can screen capture reveal about students’ use of software tools when undertaking a paraphrasing task? Journal of Academic Writing, 8(2), 176–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, I., & de Roock, R. (2013). Capturing the sociomateriality of digital literacy events. Research in Learning Technology, 21(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, I., de Roock, R., & Adams, J. (2015). Diving deep into digital literacy: Emerging methods for research. Language and Education, 29(6), 477–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., Bernadette, H. A., & van Hout-Wolters, M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caws, C., & Hamel, M. -J. (2016). Language-learner computer interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 37–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elola, I., & Mikulski, A. (2013). Revisions in real time: Spanish heritage language learners’ writing processes in English and Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 646–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Gilmore, A. (2018a). Expert-novice interaction as the basis for L2 developmental activity: A SCT perspective. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 5(1), 21–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018b). Tracking the real-time evolution of a writing event: Second language writers at different proficiency levels. Language Learning, 68(2), 469–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). A mixed methods case study on the use and impact of web-based lexicographic tools on L2 writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geisler, C., & Slattery, S. (2007). Capturing the activity of digital writing: Using, analyzing, and supplementing video screen capture. In H. A. McKee & D. N. DeVoss (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues (pp. 185–200). Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Gentil, G. (2018). Modern languages, bilingual education, and translation studies: The next frontiers in WAC/WID research and instruction? Across the Disciplines, 15(3), 114–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, A., & Gánem-Gutierrez, G. (2020). Investigating complexity in L2 writing with mixed methods approaches. In G. G. Fogal & M. H. Verspoor (Eds.), Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 writing development (pp. 183–206). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2022). The Process Corpus of English in Education: Going beyond the written text. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 10(1), 31–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G., & Laporte, S. (2021). The use of online writing tools by learners of English: Evidence from a process corpus. International Journal of Lexicography, 34(4), 472–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, T. (2019). Multilingual students’ use of their linguistic repertoires while writing in L2 English. Lingua, 224, 34–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamel, M. -J., & Séror, J. (2016) Video screen capture to document and scaffold the L2 writing process. In C. Caws & M. -J. Hamel (Eds.), Language-learner computer interactions: Theory, methodology, and applications (pp. 137–162). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamel, M. -J., Séror, J., & Dion, C. (2015). Writers in action: Modelling and scaffolding second-language learners’ writing process. Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. Retrieved on 27 April 2023 from [URL]Google Scholar
Hort, S. (2020). Digital writing, word processors and operations in texts: How student writers use digital resources in academic writing processes. Journal of Academic Writing, 10(1), 43–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, C. (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 171–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khuder, B., & Harwood, N. (2015). L2 writing in test and non-test situations: Process and product. Journal of Writing Research, 6(3), 233–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). L2 writing task representation in test-like and non-test-like situations. Written Communication, 36(4), 578–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleyn, T., & García, O. (2019). Translanguaging as an act of transformation: Restructuring teaching and learning for emergent bilingual students. In L. de Oliveira (Ed.), The handbook of TESOL in K-12 (pp. 69–82). Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, S. -L., & Chen, H. -J. H. (2015). Dictionaries vs concordancers: actual practice of the two different tools in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(4), 341–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leander, K. M., & Burriss, S. K. (2020). Critical literacy for a posthuman world: When people read, and become, with machines. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1262–1276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke logging in writing research: Using Inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Communication, 30(3), 358–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schriver, K., & Hayes, J. R. (2014). Writing in the workplace: Constructing documents using multiple digital sources. Journal of Writing Research, 5(3), 285–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P., & Mercer, J. D. (2015). Depth of processing in L2 learning: Theory, research, and pedagogy. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 2(1), 69–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. (Eds.). (2019). Observing writing. Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macgilchrist, F., & Van Hout, T. (2011). Ethnographic discourse analysis and social science. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L. (2009). The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes: Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 102–129). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meredith, J. (2016). Transcribing screen-capture data: The process of developing a transcription system for multi-modal text-based data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(6), 663–676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. S., Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2008). The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer keystroke logging TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 433–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, K. (2015). Literacy theories for the digital age: social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. (2020). Conversations autour du plurilinguisme. Théorisation du pluriel et pouvoir des langues. OLBI Working Papers, 10, 43–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mroz, A. P. (2014). Process research screen capture. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–7). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özkul, S., & Ortactepe, D. (2017). The use of video feedback in teaching process-approach EFL writing. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 862–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, K., & Kinginger, C. (2010). Writing/thinking in real time: Digital video and corpus query analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 31–50. [URL]Google Scholar
Plowman, L., & Stephen, C. (2008). The big picture? Video and the representation of interaction. British Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 541–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ranalli, J., Feng, H. -H., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2018). Exploring the potential of process-tracing technologies to support assessment for learning of L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 77–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., & Michel, M. (2019). Methodological advances in investigating L2 writing processes: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 491–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, T. (2002). An intellectual history of NUD*IST and NVivo. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(3), 199–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabbaghan, S., & Maftoon, P. (2015). The affordances of screen capture technology for retrospective analysis of the writing process. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 4(1), 35–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sala-Bubaré, A., & Castelló, M. (2018). Writing regulation processes in higher education: a review of two decades of empirical research. Reading and Writing, 31(4), 757–777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M. (2004). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54(3), 525–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Séror, J. (2013). Show me! Enhanced feedback through screencasting technology. TESL Canada Journal, 30(1), 104–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Screen capture technology: A digital window into students’ writing processes/Technologie de capture d’écran: Une fenêtre numérique sur le processus d’écriture des étudiants. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue Canadienne de l’Apprentissage et de la Technologie, 39(3), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Plurilingualism in digital spaces. In E. Piccardo, A. Germain-Rutherford, & G. Lawrence (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of plurilingual language education (pp. 449–464). Routledge.Google Scholar
Séror, J., & Gentil, G. (2020). Cross-linguistic pedagogy and biliteracy in a bilingual university: Students’ stances, practices, and ideologies. Canadian Modern Language Review / La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 76(4), 356–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Plurilingual writing processes at the heart of biliteracy development. Paper presented in V. Johannsson & A. Wengelin (Organizers), S197 Writing processes: Strategies from idea to text. Symposium conducted at AILA 2021, Groningen, Netherlands.
Silva, M. L. (2012). Camtasia in the classroom: Student attitudes and preferences for video commentary or Microsoft Word comments during the revision process. Computers and Composition, 29(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. E., Pacheco, M. B., & de Almeida, C. R. (2017). Multimodal codemeshing: Bilingual adolescents’ processes composing across modes and languages. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 6–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takayoshi, P. (2015). Short-form writing: Studying process in the context of contemporary composing technologies. Computers and Composition, 37, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Methodological challenges to researching composing processes in a new literacy context. Literacy in Composition Studies, 4(1), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Language Archive. (2021, October 18). ELAN. [URL]
Tillema, M., van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T. (2011). Relating self reports of writing behaviour and online task execution using a temporal model. Metacognition and Learning, 6(3), 229–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., Wengelin, Å., & Lindgren, E. (2012). Logging tools to study digital writing processes. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 507–533). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Wei, L. (2017). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, C. (2016). Individual differences in online reference resource consultation: Case studies of Korean ESL graduate writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hakim, Angela, Wei Xu, Kevin Fedewa, WeiHsuan Lo, Matt Kessler & Christine M. Tardy
2024. Researching genre knowledge across languages and contexts. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.