Cover not available
Part of
Complexity Theory and Language Development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman
Edited by Lourdes Ortega and ZhaoHong Han
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 48] 2017
► pp. 163–190

Chapter 8
Language destabilization and (re-)learning from a Complexity Theory perspective

Timescales and patterns across four studies

| Trinity College Dublin & University of St Andrews
The growing interest in Complexity Theory (CT) within second language acquisition has refocused our attention on development and change, as exemplified by the non-linear processes of language destabilization and (re-)learning in multilingual systems. It is clear that this theoretical perspective has important implications for empirical research from design to analysis and interpretation. In this chapter, I take a first step towards applying the theoretical apparatus of CT to findings obtained in four different studies of multilingual development. I show how the findings can be interpreted using CT as a post-hoc theoretical prism and, in turn, how the findings support and explicate CT claims. The four studies involved multilingual adult second-language learners and users in Ireland and were designed to address different timescales ranging from weeks to years, and time windows from one year to decades. Thus, the study goes some way towards de Bot’s (2012, 2015) suggestion to investigate complex dynamic systems by focusing on adjacent timescales. Although the studies differ in their purpose and design, they partially overlap in methodology and analysis, and exemplify how, through convergence of methodological and analytical procedures, one may generalise from the particular.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Four studies: A preview
  • The German-Irish migrant study
    • Background
    • Key findings
  • Sandra’s case study
    • Background
    • Key findings
  • The multilingual language teachers study
    • Background
    • Key findings
  • The Russian foreign language (FL) student study
    • Background
    • Key findings
  • General discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 1 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.09opi
References (31)
References
Bartlett, R., & Milligan, C. (2015). What is diary method. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K. (2012). Timescales in second language development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 143–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Rates of change. Timescales in second language development. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 29–37). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Martens, V., & Stoessel, S. (2004). Finding residual lexical knowledge: The “savings” approach to testing vocabulary. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8(3), 373–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., & Stoessel, S. (2000). In search of yesterday’s words: Reactivating a long-forgotten language. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 333–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goral, M. (2001). Lexical access and language proficiency of trilingual speakers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Han, Z., & Tarone, E. (Eds.). (2014). Interlanguage: Forty years later. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism. Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hiver, P. (2015). Attractor states. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 20–28). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Complexity Theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z-H. Han (Eds.), Complexity Theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meara, P., Milton, J., & Lorenzo-Duz, N. (2001). Language Aptitude Tests (1st ed.). Newbury, UK: Express Publishing.Google Scholar
Opitz, C. (2011). First language attrition and second language acquisition in a second language environment. Unpublished PhD thesis, Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
(2012). Change and stability in adult L1 and L2 development: A longitudinal pilot case study. Paper presented at the 22nd Conference of the European Second Language Association, Poznań.
(2013). Dynamics of L2 development in an ab initio learner of Russian. Paper presented at the 23rd Conference of the European Second Language Association, Amsterdam.
(2015). Learner language destabilization and relearning: Complex patterns? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Colloquium in honour of Diane Larsen-Freeman, Complexity Theory in SLA: Staking out the Territory, Toronto.
(2016). Little to lose and everything to gain: L1 maintenance and L2 attainment in long-term migrants. CALL: Irish Journal for Culture, Arts, Literature and Language, 1(1), Article 5.Google Scholar
Opitz, C., & Smyth, S. (2014). “Dear diary” – L2 proficiency development through diary writing. Paper presented at AILA: The 17th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Brisbane.
(2016). Ab initio language learning and the summer break. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Language Attrition, Colchester, UK.
Sabourin, L. (1988). Processus lexico-semantiques et hemisphere droit: Etude de la fluence verbale a partir de crittres formels et semantiques. Unpublished MSc thesis, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2004a). The Language Attrition Test Battery. A research manual. Unpublished manuscript, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
(2004b). A new blueprint for language attrition research. In M. S. Schmid, B. Köpke, M. Keijzer & L. Weilemar (Eds.), Language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues (pp. 349–363). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10(1–4), 209–232.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1983). On explaining language loss. In S. W. Felix & H. Wode (Eds.), Language development at the crossroads (pp. 49–89). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
(1991). Language modules and bilingual processing. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 10–24). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
St-Hilaire, A., Hudon, C., Vallet, G. T., Bherer, L., Lussier, M., Gagnon, J. -F., …, & Macoir, J. (2016). Normative data for phonemic and semantic verbal fluency test in the adult French-Quebec population and validation study in Alzheimer’s disease and depression. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(7), 1126–1150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tombaugh, T. N., Kozak, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and animal naming. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14(2), 167–177.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M. (2015). Initial conditions. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 39–46). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wysokiński, A., Zboralski, K., Orzechowska, A., Gałecki, P., Florkowski, A., & Talarowska, M. (2010). Normalization of the Verbal Fluency Test on the basis of results for healthy subjects, patients with schizophrenia, patients with organic lesions of the chronic nervous system and patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes. Archives of Medical Science, 6(3), 438–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Nelson, Christina
2022. Do a Learner’s Background Languages Change with Increasing Exposure to L3? Comparing the Multilingual Phonological Development of Adolescents and Adults. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Levine, Glenn S.
2020. References. The Modern Language Journal 104:S1 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.