Cover not available
Part of
Current Perspectives on Generative SLA - Processing, Influence, and Interfaces: Selected proceedings of the 16th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference
Edited by Marta Velnić, Anne Dahl and Kjersti Faldet Listhaug
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 70] 2024
► pp. 1–8

Introduction

| Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
| Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
| Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (20)
References
Bylund, E., Khafif, Z., & Berghoff, R. (2023). Linguistic and geographic diversity in research on second language acquisition and multilingualism: An analysis of selected journals. Applied Linguistics, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Continuity and shallow structures in language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 107–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunnings, I. (2017). Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4), 659–678. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Domenico, E. (2021). Bilingualism and (outward) over-explicitness in the choice of subject anaphoric devices. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali, 7, 51–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A. (2001). What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2016). The timing of lexical and syntactic processes in second language sentence comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1253–1280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacob, G., & Felser, C. (2016). Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 907–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X. (2011). Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 61(3), 940–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsden, H., & Slabakova, R. (2019). Grammatical meaning and the second language classroom: Introduction. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 147–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, S. (2009). Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Agreement beyond phi. The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(2), 299–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R. (2018). The generative approach to SLA and its place in modern second language studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 417–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2013). What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language. In M. d. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutiérrez Mangado, & M. Martínez-Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 5–8). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar