Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Input, Evidence, and Exposure in Language Acquisition: Studies in honour of Susanne E. Carroll
Edited by Lindsay Hracs
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 69] 2024
► pp. 245–266

Chapter 10
Varieties of DP recursion

Syntax, semantics, and acquisition

| University of Toronto
| University of Toronto
| University of Toronto
| University of Toronto
| University of Houston
Our objective is to shed light on recursion through an exploration of the L1 development of four DP structures in English. Since recursion is in narrow syntax, there is no reason to expect asymmetries between constructions but specific formal differences between structures might make acquisition of certain forms more difficult, and there may be differences according to meaning classes. We report a study targeting possessives, comitatives, locatives, and part-whole expressions, each with 2-level embedding. The results reveal statistically significant effects of age and condition, with no interaction. Possessives and comitatives develop earlier than locatives and relatives, and are also more productive for adults. These results help us to delineate the domain of recursion and formulate a credible developmental scenario.
Keywords: acquisition, syntax, recursion, English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Background and context
    • 1.2Merge and recursion
  • 2.Recursive DPs in English and their acquisition
    • 2.1On modification
    • 2.2Acquisition of NP recursion in English
  • 3.English recursion study
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Task
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.69.10per
References (35)
References
Amaral, L., Maia, M., Nevins, A. & Roeper, T. (eds). 2018. Recursion in Brazilian Languages and Beyond. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Arslan, B., Hohenberger, A. & Verbugge, R. 2017. Syntactic recursion facilitates and working memory predicts recursive theory of mind. PLOS ONE 12(1): e0169510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bejar, S., Massam, D., Pérez-Leroux, A. T. & Roberge, Y. 2020. Rethinking complexity. In Syntactic Architecture and its Consequences, I: Syntax Inside the Grammar, A. Bárány, T. Biberauer, J. Douglas & S. Vikner (eds), 15–24. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C. 2014. Elementary Syntactic Structures: Prospects of a Feature-Free Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. E. 2001. Input and Evidence: The Raw Material of Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Input and SLA: Adults’ sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender. Language Learning 55(S1): 79–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 104–131. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. Fundamental operations of language: Reflections on optimal design. Cadernos de Linguística 1(1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, C. & Katsos, N. 2010. Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations? Lingua 120(8): 1956–1972. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, A. M. 2015. On the domain specificity of the human language faculty and the effects of principles of computational efficiency: Contrasting language and mathematics. Linguíʃtica 11(1): 28–56.Google Scholar
Dollaghan, C. & Campbell, T. F. 1998. Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 41(5): 1136–1146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, S. L., Ukrainetz, T. A., Hsu, J. R., Kaderavek, J.N, Justice, L. M. & Gillam, R. B. 2008. Noun phrase elaboration in children’s spoken stories. Language, Speech, And Hearing Services in Schools 39(2): 145–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernst, T. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Giblin, I., Zhou, P., Bill, C., Shi, J. & Crain, S. 2018. The spontaneous eMERGEnce of recursion in child language. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, M. M. Brown & B. Dailey (eds), 270–285. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L. & Lederer, A. 1999. Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition 73(2): 135–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. 1990. The structural sources of verb meaning. Language Acquisition 1(1): 3–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, A. S. & Kaufman, N. L. 2004. Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd ed. Circle Pines MN: AGS Publishing.Google Scholar
Li, D., Yang, X., Roeper, T., Wilson, M., Yin, R., Kim, J., Merritt, E., Lopez, D. & Tero, A. 2020. Acquisition of recursion in child Mandarin. In Proceedings of the Annual 44th Boston University Conference on Language Development, M. M. Brown & A. Kohut (eds), 294–307. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Limbach, M. & Adone, D. 2010. Language acquisition of recursive possessives in English. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, K. Franich, K. M. Iserman & L. L. Keil (eds), 281–290. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Fernandes, K. J. & Johnson, S. P. 1999. Rule learning in 7-month-old infants. Science 283(5398): 77–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merx, M. 2016. The Production and Comprehension of Recursive Possessive and Preposition Phrases of Dutch Children and Adults. BA thesis, University of Groningen
Nadig, A. S. & Sedivy, J. C. 2002. Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children’s on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 13(4): 329–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. & Preston, L. B. (eds.) 2014. Measuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Castilla-Earls, A., Béjar, S. & Massam, D. 2012. Elmo’s sister’s ball: The problem of acquiring nominal recursion. Language Acquisition 19(4): 301–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Peterson, T., Bejar, S., Castilla-Earls, A., Massam, D. & Roberge, Y. 2018a. The acquisition of recursive modification in NPs. Language 94(2): 332–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Castilla-Earls, A., Bejar, S., Massam, D. & Peterson, T. 2018b. Strong continuity and children’s development of NP recursion. In Recursion in Brazilian Languages and Beyond, M. Maia, L. Amaral & A. Nevins (eds), 182–200. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T. & Roberge, Y. 2018. A way into recursion. In UMOP 41: Thoughts on Mind and Grammar (T.O.M. and grammar): A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper, B. Hollebrandse, J. Kim, A. T. Pérez-Leroux & P. Schulz (eds), 109–122. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Y. Roberge, A. Lowles & P. Schulz. 2020. Structural diversity does not affect the acquisition of recursivity: The case of possession in German. Language Acquisition 29(1): 54–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeper, T. 2011. The acquisition of recursion: How formalism articulates the child’s path. Biolinguistics 5(1–2): 57–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeper, T., Maia, M. & França, A. I. 2020. Old story, new results and analyses: An eye-tracking and ERP evaluation of a classical ambiguity involving the attachment point of relative clause and prepositional phrase modifiers. Cadernos de lingüística 1(1): 1–24, 9 Jul. 2020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeper, T., & Snyder, W. 2005. Language learnability and the forms of recursion. In UG and External Systems: Language, Brain and Computation, A. M. Di Sciullo (ed.), 155–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H. 2011. An Element-theoretical approach to cohesion and repulsion in syntax. Paper presented at New Perspectives on Language Creativity: Composition and Recursion. Montreal, Canada.
Widmer, M., Auderset, S., Nichols, J., Widmer, P. & Bickel, B. 2017. NP recursion over time: Evidence from Indo-European. Language 93(4): 799–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. 2016. The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break Rules of Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar