Chapter 8
Comparisons of thought presentation in PREST and PAST
This chapter compares thought presentation in PREST and
PAST, category by category on the cline from both quantitative and
qualitative perspectives. In present-tense narrative, FDT is the primary
means to present character thought, and its unique role in this context will
be brought out not only by comparing FDT in both corpora but also by
comparing FDT in PREST with FIT in PAST. After discussing the direct forms,
the usage of indirect forms will also be examined in the contexts in which
they occur and be compared. NI, which is often regarded as intermediate
between thought presentation and narration, will be examined independently,
excluding it from the indirect forms. At the end of the chapter, we will
review the issue of what are the norms for speech and thought
presentation.
Article outline
- 8.1Quantitative overview
- 8.2Direct forms of thought presentation: FDT and DT
- 8.2.1FDT in PREST and PAST
- 8.2.2FDT in 1st-person present-tense narrative
- 8.2.3The annotation of character thought and narration in 1st-person
narrative in PREST
- 8.2.4Analysis of textual structures presenting FDT in PREST and FIT in
PAST
- 8.2.4.1N + FDT in PREST and N + FIT in PAST
- 8.2.4.2NI + FDT in PREST and NI + FIT in PAST
- 8.3Indirect forms of thought presentation
- 8.3.1Free Indirect Thought (FIT)
- 8.3.2Indirect Thought (IT)
- 8.3.3Narrator’s Representation of Thought Acts (NRTA(p))
- 8.4Internal Narration (NI)
- 8.4.1Quantitative overview
- 8.4.2Qualitative comparisons
- 8.5The norms in speech and thought presentation
- 8.6Conclusion
-
Notes
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.