Cover not available
Part of
Recent Developments in Hispanic Linguistics: Studies in structure, variation, and bilingualism
Edited by Michael Gradoville and Sean McKinnon
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 41] 2024
► pp. 24–43

Chapter 1
When left dislocation meets epithets

| University of Georgia
In Spanish syntax, a clitic left-dislocated constituent may incorporate a coreferential epithet within the sentence, along with a clitic as a resumptive element. In previous research, there exist three approaches to the relationships among the dislocated constituent, the clitic, and the epithet. The first suggests the dislocated constituent is originally generated in its surface position. The second argues it originates in a small clause with the epithet, then moves to the left periphery. The third contends the constituent is part of a distinct clause, truncated by ellipsis. This study examines ditransitive verb structures featuring epithets in Peninsular Spanish, advocating that the left dislocation with an internal epithet results from syntactic movement, contributing new insights to this ongoing debate.
Keywords: clitic left dislocation, movement, predication, epithet
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous analyses
    • 2.1CLLD+epithet in Suñer (2006)
    • 2.2CLLD+epithet in López (2009)
    • 2.3CLLD+epithet in Estigarribia (2017, 2020)
  • 3.A closer look at CLLD+epithet
    • 3.1Problems of the bi-clausal account
      • 3.1.1Number mismatch exists in small clauses
      • 3.1.2Impossible ellipsis
    • 3.2CLLD+epithet is a case of movement out of a small clause
      • 3.2.1Syntactic assumptions of small clauses
      • 3.2.2Justification for the movement out of a small clause approach
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (44)
References
Alexiadou, A. (2008). Left dislocation (including CLLD). In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (pp. 668–699). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aoun, J., & Choueiri, L. (2000). Epithets. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 18(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basilico, D. (2003). The topic of small clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(1), 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowers, J. (1993). The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 591–656.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Guasti, M. T. (1995). Small clauses. Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casielles-Suárez, E. (2003). Left-dislocated structures in Spanish, Hispania, 86(2), 326–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–156). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1990). Types of A′-Dependencies. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Citko, B. (2008). Small clauses reconsidered: not so small and not all alike. Lingua, 118, 261–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Small clauses. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(10), 748–763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuervo, M. C. (2003). Structural asymmetries but same word order: the dative alternation in Spanish. In A. M.di Sciullo (Ed.), Asymmetry in grammar (pp. 117–144). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. (1995). Null operator-variable structures, predication and the interpretive interface. [Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University].
Dubinsky, S., & Hamilton, R. (1998). Epithets as antilogophoric pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 685–693. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S. (1999). Unprincipled syntax and the derivation of syntactic relations. In S. D. Epstein & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Working Minimalism (pp. 317–345). MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S., Groat, E., Kawashima, R., & Kitahara, H. (1998). A derivational approach to syntactic relations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., & Seely, D. (1999). Specifying the GF ‘subject’: eliminating A-chains and the EPP within a derivational model. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (1995). Lefthand satellites in Spanish. Institute for Language and Speech (OTS) dissertation series.
Estigarribia, B. (2017). The semantics of Spanish clitic left dislocations with epithets. Probus, 29(2), 287–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). A biclausal account of clitic left-dislocations with epithets in Rioplatense Spanish. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 5(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Gupton, T. (2014). The Syntax-Information Structure Interface. De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, S. (1991). Clitics and island effects. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (2019). Gapping and stripping. In J. van Craenenbroeck & T. Temmerman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis (pp. 562–604). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. (2000). Pronouns and their antecedents. In S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program (pp. 133–166). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, W. (1994). Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong. In M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (Eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory IV (pp. 220–229). Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Dislocation. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (pp. 1050–1078). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
López, L. (2009). A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics & Philosophy, 27(6), 661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, A. (1997). The raising of predicates. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Dynamic antisymmetry. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ott, D. (2014). An ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry, 45(2), 269–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a). Connectivity in left-dislocation and the composition of the left periphery. Linguistic Variation, 15(2), 229–290.Google Scholar
(2016b). Ellipsis in appositives. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(1), 1–46.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. (2007). Copular sentences in Russian: a theory of intra-clausal relations. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pineda, A. (2016). Les fronteres de la (in)transitivitat: Estudi dels aplicatius en llengües romàniques i basc [The borders of (in)transitivity: a study of applicatives in Romance Languages and Basque]. Institut d’Estadius Món Juïc.Google Scholar
(2020). Double object constructions in Romance: the common denominator. Syntax, 23(3), 203–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Introducing Arguments. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raposo, E., & Uriagereka, J. (1995). Two types of small clauses (Toward a syntax of them/rheme relations). In A. Cardinaletti & M. T. Guasti (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 28: Small clauses (pp. 179–206). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1970). Gapping and the order of constituents. In M. Bierwisch & K. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in linguistics (pp. 249–259). de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, M. (2006). Left dislocations with and without epithets. Probus, 18(1), 127–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swart, W. (2000). Issues relating to a derivational theory of binding. In S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program (pp. 269–304). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vallduví, E. (1988). Functional load, prosody and syntax: Left-detachment in Catalan and Spanish. CLS, 24, 391–404.Google Scholar
Villalba, X. (2000). The syntax of sentence periphery. [Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona].