Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 27th Annual Installment
Edited by Mieke Vandenbroucke, Jana Declercq, Frank Brisard and Sigurd D’hondt
[Handbook of Pragmatics 27] 2024
► pp. 85–97

Nils Erik Enkvist

| University of Helsinki
| Åbo Akademi University
Article outline
  • 1.Life and overview
  • 2.Stylistics
    • 2.1Literary pragmatics
  • 3.Text linguistics
    • 3.1Promoting text linguistics
    • 3.2Cohesion and coherence
    • 3.3Interpretability and textual worlds
  • 4.Studies on interaction
    • 4.1Impromptu speech
    • 4.2The CIF principle
  • 5.Old English
  • 6.Iconicity
  • 7.Applied linguistics
  • 8.Academic administration, honors, and legacy
  • Note
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (57)
References
Andersson, Erik (ed). 1978. Working Papers on Computer Processing of Syntactic Data. Turku: Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar
Björklund, Martina. 1993. Narrative Strategies in Čechov’s The Steppe: Cohesion, Grounding and Point of View. Turku: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1951. Caricatures of Americans on the English Stage prior to 1870. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum, 18, 1.Google Scholar
. 1953. American Humour in England before Mark Twain. Turku: Åbo Akademi University. Acta Academiae Aboensis, Humaniora, 21, 3.Google Scholar
. 1957. The Seasons of the Year. Chapters on a Motif from Beowulf to the Shepherd’s Calendar. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum, 22, 4.Google Scholar
. 1964a. Geoffrey Chaucer. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.Google Scholar
. 1964b. “On defining style: An essay in applied linguistics.” In Linguistics and Style, by Nils Erik Enkvist, John Spencer and Michael Gregory, 1–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1970. Kielipalveluopetuksen peruskysymyksiä [Basic issues for language center teaching]. Turku: Åbo Akademi University. Working Papers from the Department of English, Åbo Akademi University, no. 3.Google Scholar
. 1972. “Old English adverbial þa – an action marker?” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen LXXIII: 90–96.Google Scholar
. 1973a. Linguistic Stylistics. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1973b. “‘Theme dynamics’ and style: An experiment.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 5: 127–135.Google Scholar
. 1974. Stilforskning och stilteori [Research on style, and the theory of style]. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
. 1975. Tekstilingvistiikan peruskäsitteitä [Basic concepts in text linguistics]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
. 1978. “Coherence, pseudo-coherence, and non-coherence.” In Reports on Text Linguistics: Semantics and Cohesion, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, 109–127. Turku: Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar
. 1981. “Experiential iconicism in text strategy.” TEXT 1: 97–111.Google Scholar
. (ed). 1982a. Impromptu Speech: A Symposium. Turku: Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar
. 1982b. “Categories of situational context from the perspective of stylistics.” In Surveys 1: Eight State-of-the-Art Articles on Key Areas in Language Teaching, ed. by Valerie Kinsella, 58–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1984. “Contrastive linguistics and text linguistics.” In Contrastive Linguistics: Prospects and Problems, ed. by Jacek Fisiak, 45–67. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (ed). 1985a. Coherence and Composition. Turku: Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar
. 1985b. “A parametric view of word order.” In Text Connexity, Text Coherence: Aspects, Methods, Results, ed. by Emel Sözer, 320–336. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
. 1986a. “More about the textual functions of the Old English adverbial þa.” In Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries. Vol 1: Linguistic Theory and Historical Linguistics. Vol 2: Descriptive, Contrastive, and Applied Linguistics, ed. by Dieter Kastovsky and Aleksander Szwedek, 301–310. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986b. “Linearization, text type, and parameter weighting.” In Language and Discourse: Test and Protest, ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 245–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987a. “Text linguistics for the applier: An orientation.” In Writing Across Languages: Analysis of L2 Text, ed. by Ulla Connor and Robert B. Kaplan, 23–43. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
. 1987b. “Text strategies: Single, dual, multiple.” In Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, ed. by Ross Steele and Terry Treadgold, 203–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Connexity, interpretability, universes of discourse, and text worlds.” In Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65, ed. by Sture Allén, 162–186. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1990. “Seven problems in the study of coherence and interpretability.” In Coherence in Writing: Research and Pedagogical Perspectives, ed. by Ulla Connor and Ann M. Johns, 9–28. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
. 1991. “On the interpretability of texts in general and of literary texts in particular.” In Literary Pragmatics, ed. by Roger D. Sell, 1–25. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Reminiscences of a multilingual life: A personal case history.” In Reflections on Multiliterate Lives, ed. by Diane Belcher and Ulla Connor, 51–59. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik, and Viljo Kohonen (eds). 1976. Reports on Text Linguistics: Approaches to Word Order. Turku: Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar
(eds). 1978. “Cloze testing: Some theoretical and practical aspects.” AFinLA Yearbook 8: 181–206.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik, and Hans Nordström. 1978. “On textual aspects of intonation in Finland-Swedish newscasts.” Studia Linguistica 32: 63–79.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik, and Brita Wårvik. 1987. “Old English þa, temporal chains, and narrative structure.” In Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba and Giuliano Bernini, 221–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. “Frame semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by the Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1985. “Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax.” In Iconicity in Syntax, ed. by John Haiman, 187–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 1980. “The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation.” Language 56: 515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Fred Karlsson, and Maria Vilkuna. 1980. Suomen tekstilauseiden piirteitä: Kvantitatiivinen tutkimus [On the characteristics of sentences in text in Finnish: A quantitative study]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of General Linguistics; Publications 6.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi [The large Finnish grammar]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. 1952. “Discourse analysis.” Language 28: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. “Transitivity in grammar and discourse.” Language 56: 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jesperson, Otto. 1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VII: Syntax. Copenhagen: J. Jørgensen & Co.Google Scholar
Kohonen, Viljo. 1978. On the Development of English Word Order in Religious Prose Around 1000 and 1200 A.D.: A Quantitative Study of Word Order in Context. Turku: Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. 1983. The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola. 1981. You know: A Discourse-Functional Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Pragmatics as Implicitness. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. [URL]
Östman, Jan-Ola, and Brita Wårvik. 1994. “The Fight at Finnsburh: Pragmatic aspects of a narrative fragment.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen XCV: 207–227.Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola, and Tuija Virtanen. 1999. “Theme, comment, and newness as figures in information structuring.” In Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Karen van Hoek, Andrej A. Kibrik and Leo Noordman, 91–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth Lee. 1954. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Håkan (ed). 1975. Style and Text: Studies Presented to Nils Erik Enkvist. Stockholm: Skriptor.Google Scholar
. 1987. The Role of the First Language in Foreign Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sell, Roger D. (ed). 1991. Literary Pragmatics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sell, Roger D., and Peter Verdonk. (eds). 1994. Literature and the New Interdisciplinarity: Poetics, Linguistics, History. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 1992a. Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English: Clause-Initial Adverbials of Time and Place in Narratives and Procedural Place Descriptions. Turku: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992b. “Issues of text typology: Narrative — a ‘basic’ type of text?” TEXT 12: 293–310.Google Scholar
Wårvik, Brita. 1993. On Grounding in Narrative: Survey of Models and Criteria. Turku: Department of English, Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar
. 2013. Perspectives on Narrative Discourse Markers: Focus on Old English þa. Turku: Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar