A cognitive-pragmatic account of the structural elements of the ironic event: A typology of ironist, target, and interpreter roles

Lozano-Palacio, Inés

doi:10.1075/cogls.00113.loz

Article published In:

Cognitive Approaches to Mind, Language, and Society: Theory and description
Edited by Mario Serrano-Losada and Daniela Pettersson-Traba
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1] 2024
► pp. 75–98

A cognitive-pragmatic account of the structural elements of the ironic event

A typology of ironist, target, and interpreter roles

Inés Lozano-Palacio | Universitat Politècnica de València

This article discusses the ironist, the interpreter, and the target as structural elements of irony from a cognitive-linguistic standpoint. It builds on the scenario-based approach to irony, where ironic meaning is taken as a contextually adjustable inference that results from a clash between epistemic and attested conceptual scenarios. The article provides a classification of ironist, interpreter, and target types, and then it discusses the functions of irony (i.e., attacking, mocking, being playful, showing off, and persuading) and the solidarity component involved in ironic production and interpretation. It further explains the factors involved in the identification of the epistemic and the attested scenarios, and those involved in the interpretation of irony. The resulting analysis of the structural elements of irony endows the study of irony with greater descriptive delicacy and explanatory adequacy.

Keywords: irony, structural elements of irony, ironist, interpreter, target

Article outline

1.Introduction
2.Methodology
3.A brief overview of ironists and interpreters
4.Structural elements of irony
- 4.1The ironist
  - 4.1.1Functions of irony
  - 4.1.2Solidarity
    - 4.1.2.1The identification of the epistemic scenario
    - 4.1.2.2The identification of the attested scenario
- 4.2The interpreter
  - 4.2.1Factors involved in the interpretation of irony
- 4.3The target
5.Conclusions
References

Published online: 6 June 2024

https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00113.loz

References (39)

References

Al-Hindawi, F. H. H., & Kadhim, B. J. (2016). A pragmatic study of irony in political electoral speeches. In F. H. H. Al-Hindawi & W. R. Al-Juwaid (Eds.), Pragmatic analysis of political data (pp. 260–309). Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing.

Attardo, S. (2002). Humour and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 159–179). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 113 (1), 121–126.

Colebrook, C. (2004). Irony. London: Routledge.

Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, Jr. R. W. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently?. Metaphor and Symbol, 17 (1), 57–60.

Coulson, S. (2005). Sarcasm and the space structuring model. In S. Coulson & B. Lewandowska-Tomasczyk (Eds.), The literal and nonliteral in language and thought (pp. 129–144). Berlin: Peter Lang.

Ghanem, B., Karoui, J., Benamara, F., Rosso, P., & Moriceau, V. (2020, April 14–17). Irony detection in a multilingual context. Paper delivered at ECIR 2020: Advances in Information Retrieval , Lisbon, Portugal. [URL].

Gibbs, Jr. R. W., & Beitel, D. (1995). What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 133–154.

Gibbs, Jr. R. W., Bryant, G. A., & Colston, H. L. (2014). Where is the humor in verbal irony?. HUMOR, 27 (4), 575–595.

Gibbs, Jr. R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2007). Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. New York: Erlbaum.

(2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gildenhard, I. (2011). Cicero: Against Verres. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.

Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19(2), 239–264.

(2001). Irony and its discontent. In D. Shram & G. J. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature: In honor of Elrud Ibsch (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Giora, R., Fein, O., Laadan, D., Wolfson, J., Zeituny, M., Kidron, R., Kaufman, R., & Shaham, R. (2007). Expecting irony: Context versus salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (2), 119–146.

Goldberg, A. E. (2002). Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics, 13 (4), 327–356.

(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gooch, P. W. (1987). Socratic irony and Aristotle’s ‘eiron’: Some puzzles. Phoenix, 41(2), 95–104.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

Hong, H. V., & Hong, E. H. (1989). Kierkegaard’s writings, II, volume 2: The concept of irony, with continual reference to Socrates/notes of Schelling’s Berlin lectures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hutcheon, L. (1994). Irony’s edge: The theory and politics of irony. London: Routledge.

Lozano-Palacio, I., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2022). Modeling irony: A cognitive-pragmatic account. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lozano-Palacio, I. (2023). A multidimensional approach to echoing: Categories, uses, and types. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21 (1), 210–228.

MacDonald, P., Kelly, S., & Christen, S. (2014). A path model of workplace solidarity, satisfaction, burnout, and motivation. International Journal of Business Communication, 56 (1), 31–49.

Muecke, D. C. (1969). The compass of irony. London: Routledge.

Nilsen, E. S., Glenwright, M., & Huyder, V. (2011). Children and adults understand that verbal irony interpretation depends on listener knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12 (3), 374–409.

Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17 (4), 286–290.

Popa-Wyatt, M. (2014). Pretence and echo: Towards and integrated account of verbal irony. International Review of Pragmatics, 6 (1), 127–168.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2017). Cognitive modeling and irony. In A. Athanasiadou & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 179–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2020). Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication, 71 1, 16–38.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Barreras Gómez, M. A. (2022). Linguistic and metalinguistic resemblance. In A. Bagasheva, B. Hristov & N. Tincheva (Eds.), Figurativity and human ecology (pp.15–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Lozano-Palacio, I. (2019a). Unraveling irony: From linguistics to literary criticism and back. Cognitive Semantics, 5 1, 147–173.

(2019b). A cognitive-linguistic approach to complexity in Irony: Dissecting the ironic echo. Metaphor and Symbol, 34 (2), 127–138.

(2021). On verbal and situational irony: Towards a unified approach. In A. Soares da Silva (Ed.), Figurative language – Intersubjectivity and usage (pp. 213–240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Tabacaru, S. (2019). A multimodal study of sarcasm in interactional humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Tobin, V., & Israel, M. (2012). Irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. In B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 25–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Veale, T., & Hao, Y. (2010, August, 16–20). Detecting ironic intent in creative comparisons. Paper delivered at 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Lisbon, Portugal.

Wheeless, L. R. (1978). A follow-up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4 (2), 143–157.

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Explaining irony. In D. Wilson & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.