Cover not available
Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 15:1 (2024) ► pp.73–104

Colloquialism and genre variation in Chinese

A corpus-driven study

ORCID logo | Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Colloquialization has been identified as one of the most crucial change processes of the English language, through which written genres gradually shift towards spoken styles. Colloquialism refers to the synchronous features resulting from colloquialization. There is limited research into the lexical and phrasal patterns indicating colloquialism in Chinese or how Chinese colloquialism manifests in different spoken and written genres. To extract the lexical and phrasal patterns indicating colloquialism in Chinese, this study used a corpus-driven approach to determine and compare keywords and phrase frames from two training Chinese corpora and those keywords and phrase frames with higher frequencies were retained for further testing.
Keywords: colloquialism, corpus, features extraction, genre variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Colloquialism in Chinese
  • 3.Corpora and methodology
    • 3.1Corpora
    • 3.2Delimiting colloquial features in Chinese
      • 3.2.1Training to determine the categories of positive keywords and key phrase frames
      • 3.2.2Testing to verify the significance of positive keywords and key phrase frames
    • 3.3Cluster analysis of colloquial features in each genre
  • 4.Colloquialism and genre variation
  • 5.Discussion of the colloquial features in each group
    • 5.1Colloquialism of genres in the left branch
    • 5.2Colloquialism of genres in the right branch
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.21010.li
References (42)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2020a. AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University (Available from [URL]).
. 2020b. AntGram (Version 1.2.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. ([URL]).
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Compressed Noun-Phrase Structures in Newspaper Discourse: The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy.” In New Media Language, eds. by Aitchison, Jean, and Diana M. Lewis, 169–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Viviana Cortes. 2004. “If You Look at...: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks.” Applied Linguistics 25 (3): 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Jesse Egbert. 2018. Register Variation Online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav. 2018. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1982. “Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature.” In Spoken and Written Language. Exploring Orality and Literacy, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 35–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary. 1991. “Strategies for the Assertion of Obviousness and Disagreement in Mandarin: A Semantic Study of the Modal Particle me.” Australian Journal of Linguistics: Journal of the Australian Linguistic Society 11 (1): 39–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Angela. 2023. “Reconsidering the shi…(de) Construction in Spoken Mandarin.” Chinese Language and Discourse 14 (2): 209–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Kelly J. 2017. “A Phraseological Exploration of Recent Mathematics Research Articles Through Key Phrase Frames.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 251: 71–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Haan, Peter. 1996. “More on the Language of Dialogue in Fiction.” ICAME Journal 201: 23–40.Google Scholar
Egbert, Jesse, and Michaela Mahlberg. 2020. “Fiction-One Register or Two? Speech and Narration in Novels.” Register Studies 2 (1): 72–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1994. “Conversationalization of Public Discourse and the Authority of the Consumer.” In The Authority of the Consumer, eds. by Keat, Russell, Nigel Whiteley, and Nicholas Abercrombie, 253–268. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feng, Debing, and Xiaoping Wu. 2018. “Weibo Interaction in the Discourse of Internet Anti-Corruption: The Case of “Brother Watch” Event.” Discourse, Context, and Media 241: 99–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair. 1999. “‘Agile’ and ‘Uptight’ genres: The Corpus-Based Approach to Language Change in Progress.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4 (2): 221–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 1999. “Rhetorical Strategies in Audience Participation Debates on Radio and TV.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 32 (3): 243–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2019. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Ji, Chuanbo, and Fangfang Liu. 2015. “留学生汉语书面语中的口语化倾向研究[Colloquial Trends in Chinese Compositions of Foreign Students].” Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 11: 31–37.Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2019. “Grammatical Constructions and Chinese Discourse.” In Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis, ed. by C. Shei, 102–115. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “Sentence-Final Particles: Sociolinguistic and Discourse Perspectives.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, eds. by Chu-Ren Huang, Yen-Hwei Lin, I-Hsuan Chen, and Yu-Yin Hsu, 597–615. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo, and Hongyin Tao. 2009. “The Mandarin Disposal Constructions: Usage and Development.” Language and Linguistics 10 (1): 29–58.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H., Sylvia Jaworska, and Erhan Aslan. 2021. Language and Media. A Resource Book for Students. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kruger, Haidee, and Adam Smith. 2018. “Colloquialization Versus Densification in Australian English: A Multidimensional Analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard corpus (ADHC).” Australian Journal of Linguistics 38 (3): 293–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liang, Maocheng, and Wenxin Xiong. 2008. “文本分析工具PatCount在外语教学与研究中的应用 [Applications of PatCount in Foreign Language Teaching and Research].” Waiyu Dianhua Jiaoxue [Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education] 1231: 71–76.Google Scholar
Ma, Mingyan. 2017. “汉语学习者书面语作文“口语化”倾向的语体表征 [Features of Oral Style in Chinese Compositions Written by CSL learners].” Hanyuxuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 11: 81–90.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian, and Marianne Hundt. 1995. “Why is the Progressive Becoming More Frequent in English? A Corpus-Based Investigation of Language Change in Progress.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 431: 111–122.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael. 1993. “Spoken Discourse Markers in Written Texts.” In Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse, eds. by Gwyneth Fox, Michael Hoey, and John M. Sinclair, 170–182. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne. 2012. “Media and Discourse Analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, eds. by Michael Handford, and James Paul Gee, 35–53. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing ([URL]).
Samson, Christina. 2004. “Interaction in Written Economics Lectures: The Meta-Discursive Role of Person Markers.” In Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora, eds. by Karin Aijmer, and Anna-Brita Stenström, 199–216. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 701: 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soh, Hooi Ling. 2018. “Mandarin Chinese Sentence Final de as a Marker of Private Evidence.” In Proceedings of the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, eds. by Farrell Patrick, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1980. Spoken and Written Language and the Oral/Literate Continuum. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: University of California.
Thornborrow, Joanna. 2001. “Authenticating Talk: Building Public Identities in Audience Participation Broadcasting.” Discourse Studies 3 (4): 459–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Xiao, Richard, and Tony McEnery Tony. 2004. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese. A Corpus-Based Study. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Two Approaches to Genre Analysis: Three Genres in Modern American English.” Journal of English Linguistics 33 (1): 62–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yuan, Yan Jin, and Yunbing Tang. 2015. “Framing Depression: Cultural and Organizational Influences on Coverage of a Public Health Threat and Attribution of Responsibilities in Chinese News Media, 2000–2012.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 92 (1): 99–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lang, Jun, Zhuo Jing-Schmidt & Tinggui Chen
2024. The blurry lines between popular media and party propaganda: China’s convergence culture through a linguistic lens. PLOS ONE 19:1 ► pp. e0297499 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.