Cover not available
Part of
Latin Literatures of Medieval and Early Modern Times in Europe and Beyond: A millennium heritage
Edited by Francesco Stella
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXIV] 2024
► pp. 639–646

Chapter 40
Faust’s medieval origins

The magician Faustus (or Faust, as he has been called since the eighteenth century), who enters a pact with the devil, is one of the most famous figures of world literature and can be said to symbolize the transition from the Middle Ages to the modern era. Even though the Faustus myth is genuinely modern, some medieval origins and predecessors can be identified. The gradual narrative formation of Faustus seems to be based on two literary and historical strands in particular, first the legends surrounding the renaissance magician and secondly medieval devil pact stories. Starting from the earliest sources, this chapter will delineate which characteristics are attributed to Faustus. Subsequently, both the differences and the similarities of medieval devil pact figures as precursors of Faustus will be analysed. In doing so, particular emphasis will be placed on the pivotal aspect of early modern Faust narratives, curiositas.
Keywords: historical faust/faustus, Faust’s medieval predecessors, curiositas, Renaissance magician, modernity, Pact with the devil, Simon Magus, Theophilus, Pope Joan, Goethe
Article outline
  • The “historical Faust” as a Renaissance magician
  • Faust’s predecessors: Medieval pacts with the devil
  • Faust’s modern thirst for knowledge
  • And yet: Faust as a figure of the Middle Ages
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxiv.40bau
References (21)
References
Baron, Frank. 1982. Faustus. Geschichte, Sage, Dichtung. München: Winkler.Google Scholar
Bauer, Manuel. 2018. Der literarische Faust-Mythos. Grundlagen – Geschichte – Gegenwart. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Benz, Maximilian. 2013. “Faustus infaustissimus. Kontroverstheologisches aus der Hölle des Jesuitendramas.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 87: 299–322.Google Scholar
Die Faustsplitter in der Literatur des sechszehnten bis achtzehnten Jahrhunderts nach den ältesten Quellen. 1900. Ed. by. Alexander Tille. Berlin: Emil Felber.Google Scholar
Il miracolo di Teofilo. 2000. Ed. by Alfonso D’Agostino, Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Doering, Sabine. 2001. Die Schwestern des Doktor Faust. Eine Geschichte der weiblichen Faustgestalten. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. 1990. “Der Philosoph und Magier.” In Der Mensch der Renaissance, ed. by Eugenio Garin, 175–214. Frankfurt a.M., New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. 1999. “Faust. Eine Tragödie.” In Johann Wolfgang Goethe: Faust. Texte, ed. by Albrecht Schöne, 9–464. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Haile, Harry Gerald. (ed.). 1963. Das Faustbuch nach der Wolfenbütteler Handschrift. Berlin: E. Schmidt.Google Scholar
Henning, Hans. 1959. “Faust als historische Gestalt.” Goethe. Neue Folge des Jahrbuchs der Goethe-Gesellschaft 21: 107–139.Google Scholar
Historia von D. Johann Fausten. Text des Druckes von 1587. Kritische Ausgabe. Mit den Zusatztexten der Wolfenbütteler Handschrift und der zeitgenössischen Drucke. 1996. Ed. by Stephan Füssel, and Hans Joachim Kreutzer. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Hrotsvit. 2001. Opera Omnia. Ed. by Walter Berschin. Monachii; Lipsiae: Saur.Google Scholar
James, Montague Rhodes (ed.). (1983). The Apocryphal New Testament. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mahal, Günther. 1980. Faust. Die Spuren eines geheimnisvollen Lebens. München, Bern: Scherz.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. 1948. Doctor Faustus. The Life of the German Composer Adrian Leverkühn as told by a Friend, translated from the German by H. T. Lowe-Porter. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Münkler, Marina. 2005/06. “‘allezeit den Spekulierer genennet’. Curiositas als identitäres Merkmal in den Faustbüchern des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts.” Faust-Jahrbuch 2: 61–81.Google Scholar
. 2011. Narrative Ambiguität. Die Faustbücher des 16. bis 18. Jahrhunderts. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Palmer, Philip Mason, Pattison More, Robert. 2013. The Sources of the Faust tradition from Simon Magus to Lessing. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Priesner, Claus. 2007/08. “Fausts Vorbilder – Die Naturmagier der Renaissance”. Faust-Jahrbuch 3: 241–251.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, Karl. 1830. Geschichte der Deutschen Poesie im Mittelalter. Halle: Anton und Gelbcke.Google Scholar
Schernberg, Dietrich. 1971. Ein schoen Spiel von Frau Jutten. Nach dem Eislebener Druck von 1565, ed. by Manfred Lemmer. Berlin: E. Schmidt.Google Scholar