Cover not available
Part of
Latin Literatures of Medieval and Early Modern Times in Europe and Beyond: A millennium heritage
Edited by Francesco Stella
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXIV] 2024
► pp. 578–587

Chapter 35
Troilus and Briseida in the Western literature

From the Middle Ages to the present

| Universidad de Murcia
| Universidad de Murcia
This chapter analyzes the figure of Troilus and the motif of the love triangle, consisting of him, Briseis, and Diomedes from the De excidio Troiae of Dares Phrygius to contemporary literature. We focus specifically on the medieval works that influenced the representation of these three characters and their relationship. We examine their roles in Dares’ work, in the Roman de Troie of Benoît de Sainte-Maure, in Guido delle Colonne’s Historia destructionis Troiae, in two epics of the XII and XIII centuries (De bello Troiano of Joseph of Exeter and Troilus of Albert of Stade) and in three more familiar pieces, namely Boccaccio’s Il Filostrato, Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde, and Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida, to end with a quick review of the theme from that moment until the present. The representation of the characters and their triangle was formed in the Roman de Troie following Dares, and each author who developed the story used the tradition but added his own special touches.
Keywords: Troilus, Briseis, Trojan cycle, Trojan war, epic, medieval literature
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The origins of the love story: Dares Phrygius and Benoît de Sainte-Maure
  • Guido delle Colonne
  • Different treatments after the Roman de Troie: Ylias Daretis Phrygii and Troilus
  • Boccaccio
  • Geoffrey Chaucer
  • William Shakespeare
  • Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxiv.35ray
References (26)
References
Benson, David 1989. “True Troilus and false Criseyde.” In The European Tragedy of Troilus, ed. Piero Boitani, 153–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boitani, Piero 1989. “Eros and Thanatos. Cressida, Troilus and the Modern Age.” In The European Tragedy of Troilus, ed. Piero Boitani, 281–305. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bottex-Ferragne, Ariane 2011. Réécrire l’histoire : genre romanesque et héritage historiographique dans les romans d’antiquité. Montreal: Thesis submitted to McGill University.
Bradbrook, Muriel Clara 1958. “What Shakespeare Did to Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde.” Shakespeare Quaterly 9.3: 311–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bretzigheimer, Gerlinde 2010. “Der Porträtkatalog des Dares Phrygius und seine Rezeption bei Joseph von Exeter und Albert von Stade.” Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 45: 419–444.Google Scholar
Carmona, Fernando 1984. La transformación de la narrativa a finales de la Edad Media. Murcia: Límites.Google Scholar
Frazer, Richard McIlwaine (tr.) 1966. The Trojan War. The Chronicles of Dictys of Crete and Dares the Phrygian. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gärtner, Thomas 1999. Klassiche Vorbilder mittelalterlicher Trojaepen. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Gontero, Valérie 2002. Parures d’or et de gemmes : l’orfèvrerie dans les romans antiques du XIIe siècle. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kindrick, Robert L. 1997. “Introduction.” In The Testament of Cresseid, by Robert Henryson. Available on-line: [URL]
King, Katherine Callen 1985. “Achilles amator.” Viator 16: 21–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, Chiara 2005. Troilo e Criseida nella letteratura occidentale. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, Ramón (ed.). 1985. Crónica Troiana. A Coruña: Fundación Pedro Barrié de la Maza. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, Jill 1989. “Shakespeare and Chaucer: ‘What is Criseyde worth?’.” In The European Tragedy of Troilus, ed. Piero Boitani, 219–242. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcos Casquero, Manuel Antonio (ed.). 1996. Guido delle Colonne. Historia de la destrucción de Troya. Los Berrocales del Jarama: Akal.Google Scholar
Marichal, Robert 1969. “Naissance du roman.” In Entretiens sur la renaissance du XIIe siècle, ed. by Maurice de Gandillac, 449–492. Paris/La Haye: Mouton.Google Scholar
McCall, John P. 1979. “Troilus and Criseyde.” In Companion to Chaucer Studies, ed. Beryl Rowland, 446–463. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mora, Francine 2008. « Mettre en romanz » : les romans d’antiquité du XIIe siècle et leur postérité (XIIIe–XIVe siècle), Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Natali, Giulia 1989. “Boccaccio’s Filostrato.” In The European Tragedy of Troilus, ed. Piero Boitani, 49–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Elvira, Martín Rodríguez (ed.) 1988. José Iscano. La Ilíada latina de Dares Frigio. Madrid: Coloquio.Google Scholar
Sáez Hidalgo, Ana 2001. “Introducción.” In Geoffrey Chaucer. Troilo y Crésida, 9–35. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Walker, Alice (ed.) 1969. Troilus and Cressida. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wesche, Markus 1988. Studien zu Albert von Stade. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wiegandt, Kai 2016. “‘Expectation whirls me round’: hope, fear and time in Troilus and Cressida.” In Love, history and emotion in Chaucer and Shakespeare. Troilus and Criseyde and Troilus and Cressida, ed. by Andrew James Johnston, Russel West-Pavlov and Elisabeth Kempf, 17–31. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Windeatt, Barry 1989. “Classical and Medieval Elements in Chaucer’s Troilus.” In The European Tragedy of Troilus, ed. by Piero Boitani, 111–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1992. Oxford Guides to Chaucer. Troilus and Criseyde. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar