Cover not available
Part of
Latin Literatures of Medieval and Early Modern Times in Europe and Beyond: A millennium heritage
Edited by Francesco Stella
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXIV] 2024
► pp. 507–522

Chapter 31
The art of letter-writing

A medieval Latin invention

| Univerità di Siena
This essay contains, in the first part, a chronological excursus (late 11th-late 13th century) dedicated to the ars dictandi, the medieval ars that teaches epistolography and the editing of prose texts; the most significant masters and the most important works are illustrated, from Alberico di Montecassino to Pier della Vigna and Tommaso di Capua. In the second part, on the basis of contemporary studies, a panorama of comparative research carried out or to be carried out on the materials of ars dictandi is traced; these researches demonstrate the richness of the epistolographic texts and the possibility of analysis from different perspectives, for example from the historical, sociological, juridical, documentary, rhetorical-literary, linguistic point of view and so on. The bibliography, necessarily selective, is however attentive to the new editiones principes and the most recent essays.
Keywords: medieval letters, letters collection, ars dictandi, rhetoric, literacy, women’s writing, medieval history, medieval power, love letters, consolation letters
Article outline
  • The artes dictandi: Structure and content
  • Letter collections
  • The golden age of the Latin ars dictandi (twelfth and thirteenth centuries). A selection of authors and texts
  • The dictamen amid critical debate: Suggestions for comparative research
  • The dictamen as a European discipline
  • Dictamen and rhetoric
  • Dictatores and power
  • Dictamen and the history of medieval teaching
  • Dictamen and the ars notaria
  • Dictamen and historiography
  • Love and death
  • Letters and women writers
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxiv.31bar
References (107)
References
Sources
Alessio, Gian Carlo (ed). 1983. Bene Florentini Candelabrum. Padova: Antenore.Google Scholar
Bartoli, Elisabetta (ed.). 2014. Maestro Guido, Trattati e raccolte epistolari. Firenze: Sismel.Google Scholar
. 2016. Maria natare, montes transire: l’amore nei modelli epistolari latini del XII secolo, Interfaces 2: 97–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2019. Maestro Bernardo, Introductiones prosaici dictaminis. Firenze: Sismel.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2023. Maestro Bernardo, Rationes dictandi. Firenze: Sismel.Google Scholar
Beyer, Hans J. (ed.). 1973. Die Aurea Gemma Ihr Verhältnis zu den frühen Artes dictandi. Bochum: Ruhr Universität.Google Scholar
Beyer, Hans J. (ed). 1999. Die Lombardische Briefsammlung. [URL]. (MGH Briefe d. dt. Kaiserzeit).Google Scholar
Bognini, Filippo (ed). 2008. Alberico di Montecassino Breviarium de dictamine. Firenze: Sismel.Google Scholar
Camargo, Martin (ed). 2019. Tria sunt: An Art of Poetry and Prose. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alphonso, and Pini, Virgilio (eds). 2000. Magistri Guidonis Fabae Rota Nova ex codice manuscripto Oxoniensi New College 255 nunc primum prodit curantibus. Bologna: Istituto per la Storia dell’Università di BolognaGoogle Scholar
Cartellieri, Alexander (ed). 1898. Ein Donaueschinger Briefsteller. Lateinische stilübungen des XII. jahrhunderts aus der Orléans’schen Schule. Innsbruck: Wagner Universität.Google Scholar
D’Angelo, Edoardo (ed and dir), Boccia, Alessandro, De Angelis, Teofilo, Delle Donne, Fulvio, and Gamberini Roberto (eds). 2014. L’epistolario di Pier della Vigna. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino Editore.Google Scholar
de Kegel, Rolf (ed). 1995. “Aurea Gemma Oxoniensis.” In Die jüngere Hildesheimer Briefsammlung, 193–241. Briefe d. dt. Kaiserzeit, 7. München: MGH.Google Scholar
Delle Donne, Fulvio (ed). 2007. Una silloge epistolare della metà del XIII secolo. Firenze: Sismel.Google Scholar
Ferrante, Joan. 2014. Epistole. Medieval Women’s Letters. [URL]
Garbini, Paolo. 1996. Boncompagno da Signa, Rota Veneris. Roma: Salerno Editrice.Google Scholar
Gaudenzi, Augusto (ed). 1890. “Guido Faba, Ars dictaminis”. In Il Propugnatore 3/ 13–14: 287–338; 3/16–17: 345–99.Google Scholar
(ed). 1892a. Boncompagnus de Signa, Rhetorica novissima. Bologna: In Aedibus Petri Virano.Google Scholar
(ed). 1892b. “Guido Faba, Dictamina Rhetorica”. In Il Propugnatore 5/ 25–26: 86–129;5/28–29: 58–109.Google Scholar
Hödl, Günther, and Classen, Peter (eds). 1983. Die Admonter Briefsammlung: nebst ergänzenden Briefen. Briefe d. dt. Kaiserzeit, 6. München: MGH.Google Scholar
Köensgen, Ewald (ed). 1974. Epistolae duorum amantium: Briefe Abelard und Heloises?. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristeller, Paul O. (ed). 1961. “Un’Ars dictaminis di Giovanni del Virgilio”. In Italia medioevale e umanistica 4: 179–200.Google Scholar
Luzzati Laganà, Francesca (ed). 2010. Mini de Colli Vallis Elsae Epistolae. Roma: ISIME.Google Scholar
Odebrecht, Botho (ed). 1936. “Die Briefmuster des Henricus Francigena”. In Archiv fur Urkundenforschung 14: 231–261.Google Scholar
Peek, Friedel (ed). 1952. Die Reinhardsbrunner Briefsammlung. MGH Epp. sel. 5. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Rockinger, Ludwig (ed). 1863–1864a. “Hugo Bononiensis, Rationes dictandi”. In Briefsteller und Formelbücher des 11. bis 14. Jahrunderts, 53–94. München: Georg Franz.Google Scholar
(ed). 1863–1864b. “Rationes dictandi”. In Briefsteller und Formelbücher des 11. bis 14. Jahrunderts, 94–116. München: Georg Franz.Google Scholar
Schmale, Josef F. (ed). 1961. Adalbertus Samaritanus, Praecepta dictaminum. MGH QQ zur Geistesgesch. 3. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Sutter, Carl (ed). 1849. Aus Leben und Schriften des Magisters Boncompagno, ein Beitrag zur italienischen Kulturgeschichte im dreizehnten Jahrhundert. Freiburg and Leipzig: Freiburg, Akademische Verlagsbuchhandlung von J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Thumser, Matthias, and Frohmann, Jakob (eds). 2011. Die Briefsammlung des Thomas von Capua, Berlin: MGH Digital [URL]
Vescovo, Michele (ed). 2022. Guido Faba, Gemma purpurea. Firenze: Sismel.Google Scholar
Wight, Steven (ed). 1999a. “Aurea Gemma gallica”. In Medieval Diplomatic and the Ars dictandi. [URL]
(ed). 1999b. “Boncompagnus de Signa, Boncompagnus.” In Medieval Diplomatic and the Ars dictandi. Los Angeles: [URL]
(ed) 1998a. Boncompagnus de Signa, Oliva. Medieval Diplomatic and the Ars dictandi. Los Angeles: [URL]
(ed) 1998b. Boncompagnus de Signa, Cedrus. Medieval Diplomatic and the Ars dictandi. Los Angeles: [URL]
(ed) 1998c. Boncompagnus de Signa, Mirra. Medieval Diplomatic and the Ars dictandi. Los Angeles: [URL]
(ed) 1998d. Boncompagnus de Signa, Rhetorica Novissima. Medieval Diplomatic and the Ars dictandi. Los Angeles: [URL]
Secondary literature
Alessio, Gian Carlo. 1979. “Brunetto Latini e Cicerone (e i dettatori).” Italia medioevale e umanistica 22: 123–69.Google Scholar
. 2001. “L’ars dictaminis nel Quattrocento italiano: eclissi o persistenza?” Rhetorica 19: 155–173.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Su Bonfiglio d’Arezzo.” In 750 anni degli Statuti universitari aretini, ed. by Francesco Stella, 163–86. Firenze: Sismel.Google Scholar
. 2006. Bonfiglio d’Arezzo: Dictamina. Edizione digitale [URL]
Artifoni, Enrico. 1986. “I podestà professionali e la fondazione retorica della politica comunale.” In Quaderni Storici, 63: 687–719.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Boncompagno da Signa, i maestri di retorica e le città comunali nella prima metà del Duecento”, In Il pensiero e l’opera di Boncompagno da Signa Atti del Primo Convegno Nazionale (Signa 23–24 febbraio 2001) ed. by Baldini, Massimo, 23–36. Signa: Allegri.Google Scholar
. 2011. “L’oratoria politica comunale e i laici rudes et modice literati.” In Zwischen Pragmatik und Performanz: Dimensionen mittelalterlicher Schriftkultur, ed. by Dartmann, Christoph, Scharff, Thomas, and Weber, Christoph F., 237–62. Turnhout: Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartoli Langeli, Attilio. 2020. “Scrivere all’imperatrice.” In Le lettere di Dante, 429–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Battista, Francesca. 2015. “Il Formulario della Regina Kunhuta e la retorica epistolare in Boemia nel XIII secolo”. In Le dictamen dans tous ses états: 257–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beach, Alison. 2002. “Voices from a didtant Land. Fragments of a Twelfth-Century Nuns’ Letter Collection.” In Speculum 77: 34–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bottazzi, Maria Luisa. 2016. “La lettera dei Romani all’Imperatore Corrado III”. In Art de la lettre, lettre d’art. Épistolaire politique III, 211–28. Trieste: CeRM.Google Scholar
Camargo, Martin. 1991. Ars dictaminis, ars dictandi. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
. 2001. Ars dictaminis, in Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, 50–62. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Special Delivery. Were Medieval Letter Writers trained in Performance?”, in Rhetoric beyond Words. Delight and Persuasion in the Arts of Middle Ages, ed. by M. Carruthers, Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2012. Essays on medieval rhetoric. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2015. “La déclamation épistolaire. Lettres modèles et performance dans les écoles anglaises médiévales”, in Le Dictamen dans tous ses états, 287–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cammarosano, Paolo. 2015. “Lettere fittizie e lettere autentiche nel medioevo italiano sec. XII–XIV.” In Medieval Letters between Fiction and Document, 63–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Martha, and Crouch, David (eds). 2013. Lost Letters of Medieval Life (English Society 1200–1250). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Constable, Giles. 1976. Letters and Letter Collections. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Forged Letters in Middle Ages.” In Fälschungen im Mittelalter, 5: 11–37.Google Scholar
Davide, Miriam (ed). 2013. La corrispondenza epistolare in Italia 1. Secoli xii-xv / Les correspondances en Italie 1. XIIe-XVe siècle. Atti del Convegno di studio, Trieste, 28–29 maggio 2010, Trieste: CeRM.Google Scholar
Delle Donne, Fulvio. 2010. Per scientiarum haustum et seminarium doctrinam. Storia dello Studium di Napoli in età sveva. Bari: Mario Adda.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Le Dictamen capouan: écoles rhétorique et conventions historiographiques.” In Le Dictamen dans tous ses états: 191–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delle Donne, Fulvio, Garbini, Paolo, and Zabbia, Marino (eds). 2020. Scrivere storia nel medioevo. Regolamentazione delle forme e delle pratiche nei secoli XII-XV, Roma: Viella.Google Scholar
Fälschungen im Mittelalter. 1988. Internationaler Kongreß der Monumenta Germaniae Historica, München, 16–19 September 1986. I: Kongressdaten und Festvorträge; Literatur und Fälschung; II: Gefälschte Rechtstexte; Der bestrafte Fälscher; III: Diplomatische Fälschungen (I); IV: Diplomalische Fälschungen (II); V: Fingierte Briefe; Frömmigkeit und Fälschung. Realienfälschungen. Hannover: Hansche.Google Scholar
Fleuchaus, Elmar. 1998. Die Briefsammlung des Berard von Neapel. München: MGH.Google Scholar
Garbini, Paolo. 2019. “Die Handschriftenüberlieferung als Gradmesser der Rezeption. Die Beispiele des Boncompagnus und der Rhetorica novissima Boncompagnos da Signa.” In Ars dictaminis. Handbuch: 348–351.Google Scholar
Gioanni, Stéphane, and Cammarosano, Paolo (eds). 2013. La corrispondenza epistolare in Italia 2. Forme, stili e funzioni della scrittura epistolare nelle cancellerie italiane (secoli V–XV) Les correspondances en Italie 2. Formes, styles et fonctions de l’écriture épistolaire dans les chancelleries italiennes (Ve-XVe siècle). Convegno di studio, Roma, 20–21 giugno 2011. Roma: CeRM.Google Scholar
Grévin, Benoît. 2008. Rhétorique du povoir médiéval: les letters de Pierre de la Vigne et la formation du language politique européen XIII-XV siècle. Roma: EFR. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Perspectives de recherches sur la théorie et la pratique de l'ars dictaminis (XI–XV siècles).” in Le dictamen dans tous ses états. 10–25. Turnhout: Brepols: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Al di là delle fonti ‘classiche’- Le Epistole dantesche-e la prassi duecentesca dell’ars dictaminis. Venezia: Ca’ Foscari Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grévin, Benoît, and Turcan Verkerk, Anne Marie (eds). 2015. Le dictamen dans tous ses états. Turnhout: Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Florian. 2013. Ars dictaminis. Briefsteller und verbale Kommunikation in den italinischen Stadtkommunen des 11. bis 13. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Jan Thorbecke.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Florian, and Grévin, Benoît (eds). 2019. Ars dictaminis. Handbuch der mittelalterlichen Briefstillehre, Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Martina. 2012. Das Briefbuch abt Wibalds von Stablo un Corvey. Briefe d. dt. Kaizerzeit 9. Hannover: MGH.Google Scholar
Høgel, Christian, and Bartoli, Elisabetta (eds). 2015. Medieval Letters between Fiction and Document, praef. by Stella, Francesco, Mortensen, Lars B. Turnhout: Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krautter, Konrad. 1982. “Ac si ore ad os. Eine mittelalterliche Theorie des Briefs und ihr antiker Hintergrund”. In Antike und Abendland 28: 155–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKitterick, Rosamond (ed). 1994. Books, Scribes and Learning in the Frankish Kingdoms, Sixth to Ninth Centuries. Aldershot: Variorum.Google Scholar
Montefusco, Antonio, and Milani, Giuliano (eds). 2020. Le lettere di Dante. Ambienti culturali, contesti storici e circolazione dei saperi. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morenzoni, Franco. 1994. “Epistolografia e artes dictandi”. In Lo spazio letterario del Medioevo. La circolazione del testo, II: 443–64 dir. By Cavallo, Guglielmo, Leonardi, Claudio, and Menestò, Enrico. Roma: Salerno.Google Scholar
von Moos, Peter. 1971. Consolatio. Studien zur mittellateinischen Trostliteratur über den Tod und zum Problem der christlichen Trauer. München: Fink.Google Scholar
. 2005. “L’ars arengandi » italienne du XIIIe siècle. Une école de la communication” in Id. Entre histoire et littérature. Communication et culture au Moyen Age, 389–415. Firenze: Sismel.Google Scholar
Murphy, James. 1974. Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkley-Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Polak, Emil J. 1993. Medieval and Renaissance Letter Treatises and Form Letters: A Census of Manuscripts Found in Part of Western Europe, Japan, and the United States of America. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
1994. Medieval and Renaissance Letter Treatises and Form Letters: A Census of Manuscripts Found in Part of Eastern Europe and the former USSR. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2015. Medieval and Renaissance Letter Treatises and Form Letters. A Census of Manuscripts Found in Part of Europe. The Works on Letter Writing from the Eleventh through the Seventeenth Century Found in Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, France, Germany, and Italy. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Poster, Carol, and Mitchell, Linda. 2007. Letter-writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present. Columbia: South Caroline University Press.Google Scholar
Rosso, Paolo. 2018. La scuola nel medioevo, sec. VI-XV. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Ruhe, Ernstpeter. 1975. De amasio ad amasiam. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Schaller, Dieter. 1988. “Erotische und Sexuelle Thematik in Musterbriefsammlungen des XII. Jahrhunderts.” In Fälschungen im Mittelalter 5: 63–77.Google Scholar
Schaller, Hans Martin. 1993. Stauferzeit. Ausgewählte Aufsätze. Hannover, MGH Schriften.Google Scholar
Schaller, Hans Martin, Stöbener, Kristina, Thumser, Matthias. 2017. Handschriftenverzeichnis Zur Briefsammlung Des Thomas Von Capua. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Sivo, Vito. 2015a. “La poesia nel dictamen. Prosa e versi nel Registrum di Paolo Camaldolese.” In Le Dictamen dans tous ses états: 123–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. “Prosa e versi nel Registrum di Paolo Camaldolese.” In Medieval Letters between Fiction and Document, 131–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stella, Francesco. 2010. “Chi scrive le mie lettere? La funzione autore nelle raccolte mediolatine di epistole modello.” In Auctor et auctoritas in latinis medii aevi litteris. Atti del Convegno (Benevento- Napoli 9–13 novembre 2010), ed. by. D’Angelo, Edoardo, Ziolkowski, Jan, 1071–1096. Firenze: Sismel.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Generic constants and Chronological Variations in Statistical Linguistics on Latin Epistolography.” In Analysis of Ancient and Medieval Texts and Manuscripts: Digital Approaches, ed. by Andrews, Tara, and Macé, Caroline, 159–79. Turnhout, Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Recuperare una fonte storica: i modelli di lettera.” In Le dictamen dans tous ses états: 161–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thumser, Matthias. 2015. “Les grandes collections de lettres de la curie pontificale.” In Le dictamen dans tous ses états: 209–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turcan Verkerk, Anne Marie. 2010. “Le Liber artis omnigenum dictaminum de Maître Bernard. I.” In Revue d’Histoire des Texts n.s. 5: 99–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Le Liber artis omnigenum dictaminum de Maître Bernard. II.” In Revue d’Histoire des Texts n.s. 6: 261–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “La Théorisation progressive du cursus et sa terminologie entre le Xie et la fin du XIVe siècle”. In Archivium Latinitatis Medii Aevii 73: 179–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vulliez, Charles. 1990. L’apprentissage de la rédaction des documents diplomatiques à travers l'ars dictaminis français (et spécialement ligérien) du XIIe siècle, in Cancelleria e cultura nel Medio Evo. Comunicazioni presentate nelle giornate di studio della Commissione, Stoccarda, 29–30 agosto 1985. 16 congresso internazionale di Scienze Storiche, Commission Internationale de Diplomatique Gualdo, Germano (ed). – Città del Vaticano, 76–95.Google Scholar
. 1993. Des écoles de l’Orléanais à l’Université d’Orléans, thèse dactiloscripte, Paris.Google Scholar
. 2015. “De la théorie à la pratique. Les recueils de lettres rattachés au nom de Bernard de Meung.” In Le Dictamen dans tous ses états: 145–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witt, Ronald. 2005. “The Ars of Letter-writing”. In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism II: Middle Ages, ed. by Alastair Minnis and Ian Johnson, 69–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The two latin Cultures and the Foundation of Renaissance Humanism in Medieval Italy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Ars dictaminis: Victim of ars notarie?” In Medieval letters between Fiction and Document: 359–368.Google Scholar
Woods, Marjorie Curry. 2010. Classroom Commentaries: Teaching the Poetria Nova Across Medieval and Renaissance Europe. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Worstbrock, Franz Josef, Klaes, Monika, and Lütten, Jutta. 1992. Repertorium der Artes dictandi des Mittelalters, vol. 1: Von den Anfängen bis um 1200. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Ysebaert, Walter. 2015. “Medieval letters and letter collections as historical sources: Methodological questions and reflections and research perspectives (6 th–14th centuries).” In Medieval Letters between Fiction and Document: 33–52.Google Scholar