Cover not available
Part of
Latin Literatures of Medieval and Early Modern Times in Europe and Beyond: A millennium heritage
Edited by Francesco Stella
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXIV] 2024
► pp. 3–12

Chapter 1
Combien de littératures latines médiévales ?

| École nationale des chartes - Institut de France, Paris
There are four intersecting approaches to medieval Latin literature: Latinists now study the life of Latin in its entirety from both a linguistic and an aesthetic point of view; Romance specialists are interested in Latin as the point of origin, and ethnologists as a medium of transmission; historians are beginning to consider the development of narrative and its poetization as a historical subject in its own right; historians of intellectual life appreciate the cultural transmission through the refinements and transformations of a textual heritage that is constantly being reconsidered.
Keywords: Latin literature, classical heritage, text transmission, orality, aesthetics, anonymity, allegory
Article outline
  • La littérature latine médiévale des latinistes: Une décadence, mais un héritage malgré tout
  • La littérature latine médiévale des spécialistes des textes vernaculaires, des ethnologues et folkloristes: Un réservoir indispensable mais vite oublié
  • La littérature latine médiévale des historiens: Une source sous suspicion
  • La littérature latine des historiens de la pensée
  • Notes
  • Bibliographie

Article language: French

Published online: 2 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxiv.01bou
References (15)
Bibliographie
Barthélémy, Dominique. 2018. La bataille de Bouvines, histoire et légendes, Paris: Perrin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourgain, Pascale. 2003. «Hauréau et la poésie latine médiévale». Journal des savants 2003, 2: 349–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Latin Culture and Oriental Wisdom”, dans Latinitas Perennis II. Appropriation and Latin Literature, dir. Yannick Maes, Jan Papy, Wim Verbaal, Leiden/Boston: Brill, 163–177.Google Scholar
. 2016. «Nous les Latins : une communauté culturelle à base linguistique», dans Le bon air latin, dir. H. Aupetit, A. Desbois-Ientile et C. Suzzoni, Paris: Fayard, 59–79.Google Scholar
Féry-Hue, Françoise (dir.). 2013. Traduire de vernaculaire en latin au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance, Paris: École nationale des chartes.Google Scholar
Galderisi, Claudio (dir). 2012. Translations médiévales. Cinq siècles de traductions en français au Moyen Âge (XIe-XVe siècles). Étude et répertoire. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Hauréau, Barthélémy. 1890. Notices et extraits de quelques manuscrits latins de la Bibliothèque nationale, I, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Reimitz, Helmut. 2015. History, Frankish Identity and the Framing of Western Ethnicity, 550–850, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stella, Francesco. 1995. La poesia carolingia, Firenze: Le lettere.Google Scholar
. 2010. Poesia e teologia. L’età carolingia. Predestinazione, culto delle immagini, poesia della conoscenza e dell’esegesi dans I. Biffi, C. Marabelli (eds.), Figure del pensiero medievale. III Il mondo delle scuole monastiche. XII secolo. Milano: Jaca Book, 465–538, 610–614.Google Scholar
Stock, Brian. 1983. The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries, Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turcan-Verkerk, A.-M. 2016. «La diffusion du Waltharius et son anonymat : essai d’interprétation». Filologia mediolatina 23: 59–122.Google Scholar
Uther, Hans-Jörg. 2004. The Types of International Folktales: A Classification and Bibliography Based on the System of Antti Aarne and Stith Thompson, Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Waquet, Françoise. 1998. Le latin ou l’empire d’un signe : XVIe-XXe siècle. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Werner, Karl Ferdinand. 1990. «Hludowicus Augustus. Gouverner l’empire chrétien, idées et réalités», dans Charlemagne’s Heir: New Perspectives on the Reign of Louis the Pious (814–840), dir. P. Godman et R. Collins, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 3–24.Google Scholar