Understanding textual meaning-making in Chinese high school EFL learners’ writing
A systemic functional perspective
The present study examines the ways Chinese high school EFL learners organize information in their writing. A class of 50 students at grade 9 from a local high school in Guangzhou, China, were recruited as participants. The students’ writing at grade 9 was collected as a corpus, comprising ten writing tasks from different text types. In order to gain a holistic understanding of the organization of information in student writing, the analytical framework of Theme at three levels – that is, clause, paragraph, and text – from
Derewianka and Jones (2010) was adopted. Findings show that the students have varying degrees of control over information organization at different levels. In particular, the students are not proficient in organizing information at the paragraph level. Findings also show that registerial differences affect the organization of information. The study provides relevant pedagogical implications and recommendations for this group of learners.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Textual meaning making and L2 writing studies
- 2.2Theme and information flow in writing studies
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Research questions
- 3.2Analytical framework
- 3.2.1Theme at the clause level
- Three types of Theme (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2014)
- Unmarked and marked Theme
- 3.2.2Paragraph level: Thematic progression patterns
- 1.Linear TP
- 2.Constant TP
- 3.Derived TP
- 4.Mixed
- 3.2.3Text level: Macro and hyper Theme
- 3.3Participants
- 3.4Data
- 4.Results and findings
- 4.1Choice of clausal Theme
- 4.1.1Topical Theme
- 4.1.2Multiple and simple Theme
- 4.1.3Marked Theme
- 4.2Thematic progression patterns
- 4.3Macro-Theme and hyper-Theme
- 4.4Summary of the findings
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Theme as an element in illustrating registerial difference
- 5.2Theme as an enabling resource
- 5.3Theme as an indicator of language proficiency
- 6.Conclusions and implications
- 7.Limitations and further research
- Notes
-
References
References (48)
References
Berry, M. (1995). Thematic options and success in writing. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (pp. 55–84). Pinter.
Bolton, K., & Graddol, D. (2012). English in China today: The current popularity of English in China is unprecedented, and has been fuelled by the recent political and social development of Chinese society. English Today, 28(3), 3–9. 

Byrnes, H. (2009). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 50–66. 

Chen, Q. (2019). Theme-Rheme structure in Chinese doctoral students’ research writing: From the first draft to the published paper. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 371, 154–167. 

Cheng, X. T. (2002). Cohesion and coherence in English compositions. Journal of School of Foreign Languages Shandong Teachers’ University, 2(11), 94–98.
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. Continuum.
Christie, F., & Dreyfus, S. (2007). Letting the secret out: Successful writing in secondary English. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30(3), 235–247.
Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). Mouton de Gruyter. 

Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2010). Teaching language in context. Oxford University Press.
Ebrahimi, S. F., & Khedri, M. (2011). Thematicity in research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. Educational Quest-An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 2(3), 287–292.
Fan, F. (2010). A discussion on developing students’ communicative competence in college English teaching in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 111–116.
Fries, P. H. (1981). On the status of theme in English: Arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum, 6(1), 1–38).
Gao, W. (2012). Nominalization in medical papers: A comparative study. Studies in Literature and Language, 4(1), 86–93.
Green, C. F., Christopher, E. R., & Lam, J. K. M. (2000). The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: A corpus-based enquiry. English for Specific Purposes, 19(2), 99–113. 

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). New York: Routledge. 

Hawes, T., & Thomas, S. (2012). Theme choice in EAP and media language. Journal of English for academic purposes, 11(3), 175–183. 

Herriman, J. (2011). Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 1–28. 

Leong, P. A. (2007). Developing the Message: Thematic progression and student writing. Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(3), 93–127.
Liu, N., Lin, C. K., & Wiley, T. G. (2016). Learner views on English and English language teaching in China. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10(2), 137–157. 

Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280–302. 

Lu, A. (2013). A functional grammar approach to analysing Asian students’ writing. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 49–57. 

Ma, J. (2001). Thematic progression, cohesive devices and coherence in English writing: Analysis of CET-4 and CET-6 writing papers. Foreign Language Education, 22(5), 45–50.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox Publishing.
Martınez, I. A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), 103–123. 

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). THEME as an enabling resource in ideational ‘knowledge’ construction. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (1st ed., pp. 20–54). Pinter.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2015). Register in the round: Registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics, 2(1), 9. 

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Teruya, K., & Lam, M. (2010). Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. A&C Black.
North, S. (2005). Disciplinary variation in the use of theme in undergraduate essays. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 431–452. 

Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (2009). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities. Routledge. 

Pan, L. (2015). English as a global language in China: Deconstructing the ideological discourses of English in language education. Springer. 

Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2011). Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources: Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 243–256. 

Thompson, G. (1996). Introducing functional grammar (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing functional grammar. Routledge. 

Wang, X. W. (2010). TP pattern and coherence in English writing: Analysis of TEM-4 writing papers. Foreign Language Research, 21, 103–106.
Wei, R., & Su, J. (2008). An analysis of foreign language use in Mainland China. The Journal of Chinese Sociolinguistics, 21, 9–24.
Whittaker, R. (1995). Theme, process and the realization of meanings in academic articles. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (pp. 129–146). Pinter.
Xuan, W. W. (2015). A longitudinal study of Chinese high school students learning English based on systemic functional text analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hong Kong Polytechnic University. [URL]
Xuan, W. W. (2018). Understanding experiential meaning-making in Chinese adolescent L2 writing: A systemic functional perspective. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 5. 

Xuan, W. W. (2019). Understanding logical meaning-making in Chinese high school students’ EFL writing: A systemic functional perspective. Asian EFL Journal, 23(6.1), 7–33.
Xuan, W. W., & Huang, X. E. (2017). Understanding interpersonal meaning-making in Chinese high school students’ ESL writing: A systemic functional perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(5), 227–238. 

Yang, Q., Ramírez, J. A., & Harman, R. (2007). EFL Chinese students and high stakes expository writing: A theme analysis. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (9), 99–125. 

Zhang, H., & Xuan, W. W. (2019). Word knowledge in academic literacy skills among collegiate ESL learners. Applied Linguistics Review, 10(2), 201–218. 

Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Winfred Wenhui Xuan
2024.
System networks as a resource in L2 writing education.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.