Index
A
- acceptability,5, 30, 50–51, 60, 144, 150–51, 170, 184, 189–91
- activity types,7–8, 13, 117
- agreement,49, 55–56, 61–62, 64–65, 67–68, 74, 111, 123, 253
- Amossy,2, 11, 96, 112, 199
- AMT (Argumentum Model of Topics),116–19, 125
- analogy,39, 82, 99–100, 105, 108, 150
- Anarchical Fallacies,17, 232, 239, 241, 245
- argumentation
- comparison,192, 198–99, 207
- symptomatic,148–49, 191, 199, 204, 207
- argumentation in artificial intelligence,30
- Argumentation mining,30, 38
- argumentation schemes,8, 49, 101, 113, 118, 189, 191, 194–96, 199, 204, 207
- argumentation stage,7, 50
- argumentation structure,8, 118, 134, 138, 191, 194, 198
- argumentative activity types,9
- argumentative hyper-genre,137
- argumentative indicators,52, 67, 207
- argumentative indicators of starting points,52
- argumentative patterns,117–18, 131, 189, 192, 206
- argumentative style,16, 134, 137–38, 148, 190
- argumentative text type,6
- argument mining,12, 20, 27, 38
- Argument reconstructions,119, 125
- arguments
- pragmatic,55, 61, 75, 84, 125
- rhetorical,232–33, 238, 245
- symptomatic,100, 139–40, 142–43, 146, 149
- argument schemes
- Argumentum Model of Topics.
See AMT
- Aristotelian tradition,36, 39
- Aristotle,5, 16, 49, 96, 154–56, 163–64, 173, 193
- Aristotle’s enthymemic knowledge,164
- artificial intelligence,25, 29–30
- audience, particular,48, 65
B
- book of fallacies,232–33, 242, 245
C
- charity of interpretation,67
- citations,15, 92, 95, 98, 103, 105–6
- collocation analysis,37, 40
- communicative activity types,6, 8, 16, 117, 134, 190
- communities, interpretive,158
- complements,119, 147, 174
- complex argumentation,147
- computational argumentation,13–14, 30, 37–39
- concordances,32, 39–40, 54, 58–59
- constellation,118, 189, 191
- construction, concessive,61–62, 68
- contrast, connective adjuncts of,179–80
- coordinative argumentation,147, 176
- coordinative argumentation structure,134, 147
- coordinative indicator, linguistic,203
- corporate social responsibility (CSR),106
- corpus linguistics,12, 37
- crisis,71–72, 85, 87, 158
- critical discussion,1–2, 8, 14, 47, 49–50, 67–68, 113, 244, 254
- cultures,11–12, 119, 145, 163, 171
D
- deliberation,7, 13, 17, 111–12, 125
- detached argumentative style,148–49
- dialectical profiles,47, 52, 68
- dialectics,36, 39–40, 191
- dialogue games,248–50, 253–55, 257–61
- difference of opinion,46, 49, 67, 113, 116, 118, 137, 169, 197, 203, 254
- dilemma,75, 82, 86–88, 199
- disagreement,75–76, 237, 240, 260
- disjunctive premise,75, 82, 86, 88
E
- emotions, negative,164, 254
- emotions in argumentative discourse,10
- endoxon,11–12, 49, 119, 127
- engagement,61, 111, 153–54, 178, 228, 261
- epistemic vigilance,97, 211
- establishing starting points,48, 50
- evaluation,24, 104, 107, 159–60, 174, 177–78, 183–84, 190–91
- evaluation of argumentation,190
- evaluation of arguments,24
- evaluative starting points,148–49
- explanations,50, 95, 194, 198, 206, 238, 252, 262
F
- fallacies,8, 92, 104, 107, 232–36, 239, 242
- Foucault,153–54, 153–54, 156–59
G
- game,205, 250, 253, 255–58, 260, 262
- genres,2–5, 7, 12, 15, 66, 68, 93, 148
- Grootendorst,39, 113, 116, 233
H
- Harris,37, 193, 212–13, 215–16
I
- implications, pragmatic,212–13, 216
- implicatures,51, 97, 100, 211, 213–18, 220, 223–24, 226
- implicatures and vague expressions,97
- implicitating strategies,213, 217, 220–21, 225
- implicit communication,212, 216
- implicit information processing,216
- implicit linguistic meanings,211
- implicit meanings,13, 217, 219, 225, 228
- implicitness,211, 214, 217–18, 220–24, 227
- implicit strategies,97, 106, 212, 215–16
- indicators,9, 10, 50, 52–54, 56–60, 64, 68, 83, 173–75, 177–82
- inferences,49, 59, 74, 194, 216–18, 220, 222–24
- informal logic,25, 30, 36, 38–39
- information, implicit,225, 227
- Institutional constraints and prototypical argumentative patterns,117
- institutional context,139–40
- institutional preconditions,118, 190, 192
- intended audience,4, 64–65, 136, 143
- interactive forms of discourse,47
K
- Key Word In context (KWIc),14, 26
- KWIc (Key Word In context),14, 26
L
- legal argumentation,25, 36
- legitimacy,48, 111–16, 118–19, 122–23, 125
- legitimation,111, 115–16, 126
- legitimation discourse, public,118
- Linking inferential schemes to context,118
- literary criticism,158, 165
- loci,11, 111, 119, 125, 127–28, 131
- Loci and maxims function,119
M
- macro levels of discourse,4
- main standpoints, declarative,195
- manipulation,8, 93, 96–97, 228
- maxims,11, 51, 119, 127, 235, 244, 253, 255
- metalanguage of argumentation,36
- misused implicit meanings,227
- modes of predication,173, 176, 178, 186
O
- objects of agreement,14, 46, 49, 61, 65, 68
- opening stage,14, 47, 49–50, 67–68
- Opinion article,51, 53, 66–68
- organizations, textual,170–71, 184
P
- participants, ratified,65
- Perelman,5, 11, 67, 74–76, 85, 116, 123, 133
- Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca,36, 41, 144
- persuasion,1, 92–93, 96, 105, 153–61, 164, 166, 216–17, 219–21, 227, 248–50
- persuasion and manipulation,96
- Plantin,2, 9–10, 191, 199
- polarity question,255–56, 258
- political discourse,31, 195, 227
- polyphony,10, 56–57, 61, 68
- populism,46–48, 52, 54–56, 220, 224
- practical reasoning,71, 74, 81, 83
- pragma-dialectical approach,1, 7, 25, 99, 133
- pragma-dialectical classification of argument schemes,199
- pragma-dialectical perspective,6
- pragma-dialectical theory,39, 169
- pragma-dialectical understanding of schemes,11
- pragmadialectics,8, 96, 116–18, 136
- pragma-dialectics,8, 13, 15, 49, 96, 134, 137, 170, 176, 189–92
- pragmatic argumentation,71–72, 74–76, 88, 125, 192, 195–96, 198, 200, 206
- pragmatic problem-solving argumentation,199
- predications,9, 169, 171–73, 175–76, 178, 181–82
- presuppositions,52, 97, 101, 106, 211, 213–16, 218–19, 255–60
- presuppositions and implicatures,213
- prototypical argumentative patterns,111, 113, 117–18, 189–90, 192, 195
R
- readership, intended,64, 67
- reasonableness,31, 57–58, 169, 184
- reasoning, disjunctive,74, 83
- reconstruction,11, 100, 126–28
- rhetorical fallacies,234, 242
- rhetorical figures,159, 193
- rhetorical strategies,84, 117
S
- schemes,2, 11, 13, 37–40, 99, 101, 119, 195
- scientific argumentation,32, 189–90, 194, 198, 206
- scientific discourse,36–37, 189–90, 192, 194–96, 204, 206–7
- speech acts,14, 50, 169–70, 176
- standpoint,6–8, 49, 53, 62–64, 99–100, 117–19, 138–40, 178, 189–91, 196–99, 203–7
- starting point, accepted,50, 58–59, 62–63
- starting points,7, 11, 46–54, 57–58, 60–65, 68, 120, 123, 189, 194, 205–6
- state predication,171–73, 178
- strategic maneuvering/ manoeuvring,1–2, 8, 13, 31, 46, 49, 58, 96, 102,117–18, 190, 192
- strategies of legitimation,115–16, 118–19
- structure, cognitive,4, 24, 29
- style,3–4, 17, 77, 134, 148, 172
- subordinative argumentation,127, 191, 194, 198, 200–201, 203, 207
- subtypes,124, 144, 189, 191, 195–96, 204
- supporting arguments,50, 64, 100, 129, 191, 196, 198, 207
- sustainability,111, 116, 118–22, 127, 131
- sustainability goals,124, 129, 131
T
- tag questions,52, 54–55, 57
- terminology, classical,193
- text genre,4, 13, 68, 145
- topical question,253, 255–56, 258
- topics,83, 88, 129, 172–73, 183, 211, 215–17, 219, 222–24
- Toulmin,5–6, 36, 39, 41, 191, 193
- transformations,248, 256–58
V
- vague expressions,97, 211, 221
- Vagueness Pragmatic,215–16
- values and beliefs,49, 67
- van Eemeren,7–10, 49–53, 57–58, 62, 113, 117–18, 137, 149–51, 169–70, 184, 190, 192, 194–95
- varieties, linguistic,198, 200
- visual argumentation,15, 36
- Visual Arts,16, 169, 171, 188
W
- Walton,6–7, 24, 31, 39, 40–41, 74–75, 104, 144
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.